Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Referee Collum had no reason to believe Elgin star got deliberately booked in alleged betting scam

Elgin City striker Kane Hester is one of four people accused of forming a betting scam involving the striker deliberately getting booked.

Willie Collum arrives at Dundee Sheriff Court. Image: Pix-AR.co.uk
Willie Collum arrives at Dundee Sheriff Court. Image: Pix-AR.co.uk

One of Scotland’s top referees told a court he had absolutely no reason to suspect an Elgin City player got “deliberately booked” in a game at the centre of a betting fraud probe.

Kane Hester, 27, who plays for the SPF League 2 side, is alleged to have deliberately earned a yellow card in a game he played against Premiership team Hibernian, in a Betfred League Cup game in July 2019.

The Moray club’s leading scorer lashed out at an opponent in an attempt to get himself booked as part of a betting scam with three others, prosecutors allege.

Former Arbroath striker Hester, along with Findlay Soutar, Calvin Parrot and Brodie Stewart Myles – all from Montrose – are alleged to have duped bookmaker Bet365 out of £13,583.

All were living in the Angus area at the time.

Referee ‘should have shown red’

The trial is under way at Dundee Sheriff Court, where category one elite referee Willie Collum gave evidence.

Mr Collum, 44, had officiated the game between Hibs and Elgin City in July 2019.

He told the court he had later watched back the foul which earned Hester a booking and decided he had not been harsh enough because the tackle actually merited a red card.

The court was shown footage from the game, which had been broadcast live on BT Sport.

Hester tackled his opponent from behind, with Mr Collum admitting he was not in the best position to see the foul at first.

Mr Collum told the court Hester approached him at half-time to apologise for his unsporting conduct.

“I told him to be careful in the second half, as he was on a booking.

“There were other cards given in the game. It was a scrappy match.”

Under cross-examination by Hester’s defence solicitor David Allan, Mr Collum was asked if there was anything in the player’s tackle which made him think he wanted to be “deliberately booked”?

He responded: “Absolutely not.”

Money admission

The court was also shown body-cam footage recorded by detectives as they raided the footballer’s Montrose home on Bridge Street.

Hester was shown being cautioned by DS Brian Benny after he answered the door.

He could be heard saying: “There is no point mucking you about.

“If I take you (to my parents’ home) I can give you the money.”

Hester is later recorded saying “I was booked in a game.

“My friends gave me money for it.”

A joint minute of agreement showed police found a River Island bag stuffed with £50 notes, totalling £2,400, in the bedroom of his parents’ home.

Bets placed

Gambling Commission investigator Nicholas Oliver gave evidence at the trial, explaining how bookmakers Bet365 had flagged a number of customers’ irregular betting patterns to him.

Mr Oliver was responsible for investigating the bets, allegedly placed by Soutar and Parrot via their online accounts.

Both placed bets, according to betting slips shown to the court, ranging from £10 to £500 on football matches taking place across Europe, involving teams including Manchester United, Paris St Germain, Newcastle United, Liverpool and international games at U19 level.

On July 28 2019, a slip showing a bet for £1,000 was placed on Soutar’s account for Hester to be booked in the game against Hibs.

This gave a return of £5,000 – including the initial £1,000 stake.

Another bet of £750 for Hester to be booked and for there to be more than one card shown in the game was also placed, which returned £3,750.

A third bet was placed, using Soutar’s account, for £1,000 for Hester to be booked.

This was cashed out before the game finished, returning £3,750.

The court heard Soutar had previously bet on players being booked during a match “in-play”.

Parrot’s account also showed large bets being placed for Hester to be booked in the July game, including wagers of £666 and £333, which returned almost £4,500 according to the prosecution.

The charges

The charge alleges the four co-accused duped bookmaker Bet365 out of £13,583.

They deny forming a fraudulent scheme to obtain money by placing bets Hester would “purposely commit a foul during the course of the match” and be booked at Borough Briggs Stadium in Elgin.

The charge states the four men carried out the con between July 20 and August 2 2019 and received £17,333.32 in payments from Bet365.

It also alleges £13,583.32 was obtained as unlawful winnings after five separate bets were placed.

An alternative version of the charge alleges they cheated at gambling by placing five bets on Hester being booked and he was shown a yellow card for a foul, leading to them falsely obtaining £13,583.32 in winnings.

Hester, 27, Soutar, 25, Parrot, 26, and Myles, 28, have all denied the charge and the trial continues.