Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Inquiry underway into revised Highland wind farm plan

Plans lodged for Scotland's fourth biggest turbine.
Plans lodged for Scotland's fourth biggest turbine.

A landscape architect insisted yesterday that wind turbines up to 414ft tall barely a mile from Highland homes would not be “overbearing or dominant” in the countryside.

He was speaking at the start of a five-day appeal by a French developer snubbed for a second time by Highland Council planners.

Druim Ba Sustainable Energy Ltd returned with a 10-turbine plan for a site by Blairmore Farm, Kiltarlity, after losing a previous public inquiry into a 23-tower proposal.

The fresh appeal follows Highland Council’s failure to make a decision about the revised proposal within a four-month time limit.

The initial hearing prompted one of the most vociferous campaigns yet mounted against a Highland windfarm planning application. The latest appeal began by focusing on “landscape and visual impact.”

Opening witness at the inquiry, before a sparse public audience in Kiltarlity village hall, was landscape architect Marc van Grieken of MVGLA Ltd, who appeared for the developer.

He emphasised that the revised plan would mean turbines being built a minimum of 1,800 yards from the nearest house – almost twice the distance previously indicated.

Mr van Grieken said: “The potential visual effects experienced from local residential properties is not so great that they would be reasonably and commonly described as overbearing, oppressive or dominant when considering the visual component of residential amenity.”

He also raised eyebrows on the public benches among campaigners, stating that “there are people who positively like the view of windfarms”.

In a written submission, the council’s principal planner Ken McCorquodale concludes that “the visual impact of this development would be particularly significant and, in my mind, detrimental to receptors living, working and passing through this area.”

The hearing resumes today (THURS) and continues tomorrow and next Tuesday and Wednesday.

Scottish Government reporter Robert Seaton, who is chairing the event, also chaired last week’s inquiry into the proposed Culachy wind scheme at Fort Augustus. He said yesterday that he hoped to submit his recommendations on that appeal to ministers in July.