Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Highland councillors sceptical of government plan to allow communities to decide how local money is spent

Highland Council HQ
Highland Council HQ

The Scottish Government’s push to have communities actively decide how 1% of local authorities’ budget is spent was met with scepticism at yesterday’s Highland Council Ross & Cromarty area meeting in Dingwall.

Known as ‘participatory budgeting’(PB), councils are now required by law to involve the public in decision making about how resources are spent.

Three PB meetings have taken place in the past year in the area – in Dingwall, Tain and Kyle – where community groups and members of the public decided how almost £50,000 of discretionary grants, mainly ward funding, was spent.

Councillors agreed that although the feedback was generally positive, rolling PB out into mainstream budgeting will be challenging.

Councillor Ian Cockburn (Wester Ross, Strathpeffer & Lochalsh) said he was worried about how money would reach deprived areas.

He said: “The problem is that making it a competition it favours the vocal and more educated middle classes who are good at presentations, whereas the most deprived people tend not to be able to do this, so we must find some way for the money to go to them.”

Mr Cockburn also challenged why the money for PB came out of ward budgets.

He said: “The council shouldn’t have a say if it’s what the Scottish Government wants, it’s cheeky to ask for money to come out of ward funds. Areas need cold hard cash, and it should come from other funds.”

Councillor Graham Mackenzie said questioned how representative the PB meetings were.

He said: “At the one I attended only 100 people participated out of 8,000 constituents, and the loudest voices did win on the day. I wouldn’t rush to do it again.”

Councillor Derek Macleod said PB could lead to factions and oppositions.

He said: “The ward discretionary budget worked well, councillors should know what projects are most deserving in their wards.”

Councillor Fiona Robertson said councillors in Tain ‘took a beating’ from community councils and the public at the PB meeting.

She said: “It created unease between Tain and the villages where there was none before. They felt the councillors allocated the ward budget well and they didn’t want PB again.”