Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Social housing plans for Fort William recommended for approval

Some of the group protesting against the volume of housing planned for Upper Achintore at Cow Hill in Fort William.
Some of the group protesting against the volume of housing planned for Upper Achintore at Cow Hill in Fort William.

Plans to build social housing on peat land above Fort William town centre are all set to be given the go-ahead by Highland Council.

However, residents from the area say they have “fundamental concerns” at the sheer volume of properties on a 60-acre site at Cow Hill in Upper Achintore.

The planning application in principle for 325 houses, with a full application for permission for works to begin on the first 176 houses by Link Housing is set for approval by the South Planning Committee next week.

Council papers show objections raised by local residents have already been taken into account by planners, who recommend councillors grant permission for the scheme. This is in spite of an active campaign and petition from residents raising concerns about the site, the environmental impact of removing peat for the development, and the scale of the project.

Campaign group, Lundavra Community Area Group said the houses would, if approved, be the largest single residential development in Fort William in more than 40 years.

The group’s chairman Mark Linfield said while they were supportive of much needed additional housing for the town, it should not be  a case of “housing at any price”.

Mr Linfield said: “We have written to council planners expressing our alarm that this site, which is earmarked in the council’s own local plan for only 220 houses, including 42 already developed, is now expected to accommodate a further 325 houses.

“We think this is excessive, it is far too dense for the rural periphery of a West Highland town, and the layout is poor and not conducive to creating nice places for people to live.”

Mr Linfield continued: “We have major concerns that once the deep moorland peat is removed to accommodate the new development, the existing houses will be in danger of flooding.”

He continued: “I don’t believe many of us are against a smaller development, it is the sheer size of this one in proportion to what is already built up here – roughly 650 households at the moment – so a 50% increase if all the houses get the go ahead.

“I think our group will certainly be pushing for more clarity and consultation for any future large planning applications. We have also discussed pushing for some sort of legislation for builds, to be as carbon neutral as possible in the future.”