Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Stark survey shows that 39% of roads in the Highlands are in desperate need of repair

Stark new figures reveal the huge repair bill for Highland roads.
Stark new figures reveal the huge repair bill for Highland roads.

Nearly four in 10 Highland roads need to be repaired and bringing them all up to scratch would cost an eye-watering £195m, it has been revealed.

New data from the Scottish Road Maintenance Condition Survey has shown that Highland Council has plummeted down the national league table.

In 2011, it was 11th out of Scotland’s 32 local authorities. Now it has dropped to 26th.

Tomorrow’s economy and infrastructure committee will discuss the data.

The council needs to invest £26m each year just to keep its roads at a “steady state”.

However, the last five years’ capital has fallen well short of that figure, at £8.2m in 2018-19, £6.2m in 2019-20 and £7.2m the past three years.

In 2020, the council injected an extra £20m into its roads, but a report prepared for the committee says this is not enough.

How does the Highlands compare nationally?

Of course, potholes are a popular bone of contention in more areas than the Highlands.

Local authorities across Scotland struggle to maintain roads, schools and housing against escalating welfare and social services demands.

Yet the north does appear to be falling short of its neighbours.

The Statutory Performance Indicator (SPI) provides the percentage of roads in need of maintenance treatment.

It’s calculated by adding up the roads rated ‘red’ and ‘amber’ after inspection.

In Scotland, the average SPI is 35.5%. The best performing local authority only needed repairs to 23.7% of its roads while the worst needed 54.2%.

In that context, Highland’s 39% score isn’t desperately bad.

However, the national picture is one of incremental improvement.

By contrast, the report going to Highland councillors warns that “without further and sustained funding the condition of the road network will continue to deteriorate and as such our ranking amongst the other Scottish local authorities may drop further”.

The figures back this up. Ten years ago, Highland Council was 11th in Scotland, with only 29.3% of its roads needing repair.

Highland spends £2,244 per km on its roads – 32% of the average spent per km by other local authorities.

Years of under-funding have caused the deterioration, and the council acknowledges that it has got lucky with the weather, after four relatively mild winters.

In short, more money is needed.

Rural areas feel the brunt

Rural roads are in worse condition than urban routes, with 41% needing repairs. Picture of road between Halkirk and Calder provided by Caithness Roads Recovery campaign group.

Road conditions appears to be worse in rural areas, fuelling an old argument about how they are prioritised for repair.

Generally speaking, roads with higher traffic attract more frequent maintenance than remote rural routes.

In Highland, 41% of rural roads require repairs, against 29% of roads in urban areas.

The methodology of the Scottish Roads Maintenance Condition Survey may also overlook some rural examples.

The survey examines 100% of A-class roads and 50% of B and C roads. However, only 10% of unclassified roads are inspected annually.

This means that some country roads in rural areas could go 10 years without anyone examining them.

Additionally, only 40% of the U roads are included in the sample data, to prevent the figures being skewed.

The report simply asks members of the economy committee to ‘note’ the issues. The real challenge will present itself at budget time next year.