Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘A very high degree of secrecy’: Campaign group blasts island spaceport process as they consider next move

Friends of Scolpaig claim the spaceport plans weren't made public soon enough and may have been considered too quickly by Scottish Government ministers.

An artist's impression of the planned spaceport in Scolpaig, North Uist. Photo: Fraser Architecture LLP
An artist's impression of the planned spaceport in Scolpaig, North Uist. Photo: Fraser Architecture LLP

Campaigning group Friends of Scolpaig have spoken about their ‘disappointment’ that Scottish Ministers have given Spaceport 1 the go-ahead.

The controversial planning application for a spaceport in Scolpaig, North Uist faced scrutiny from the Scottish Government.

But it was decided not to call the application in for a full review.

Friends of Scolpaig, a campaigning group that objects to the spaceport because of the impact they believe it will have on the surrounding area, says their response to the news is “extreme disappointment”.

The group has previously called for a public inquiry into the planning process.

Now, Friends of Scolpaig member and retired engineer Angus MacNab says they have concerns that the Scottish Government came to the decision not to call in the application too quickly.

‘Not as comprehensive as we would have hoped’

The “volume of documentation was massive” he says – and yet the government delivered their decision “a few days prior to their own deadline”.

“I think what we were expecting was for them to extend the deadline, which they’re allowed to do, but that didn’t happen.”

“There’s a concern that they did not go through this perhaps as comprehensively as we would have hoped.”

‘No issues’ that warrant investigating, says Scottish Government

The Scottish Government, however, says they “carefully considered” the proposal.

They then “concluded that there were no issues that warranted their involvement”.

For Friends of Scolpaig, the lack of a full review is the latest chapter in a story that’s been concerning from the start.

“We believe there’s been a very high degree of secrecy around this application,” says Mr MacNab.

He points out that there was no mention of a spaceport in the Outer Hebrides Local Development Plan made for 2018-2023.

“The Local Development Plan is silent. Seven months later, the council applied to themselves for planning consent [for the spaceport].”

‘This is not a backyard project’

Mr MacNab says he doesn’t object to spaceports as a rule.

“We’ve been accused of being NIMBYs – and the answer to that is yes, we are, ” he says.

“We do not want a spaceport in our backyard, but we don’t want it in your backyard. We don’t want it in anybody’s backyard.”

“This is not a backyard project. That’s the key.”

A rendering of a rocket taking off at the proposed spaceport site in scotland
An artist’s impression of a rocket launch at the proposed Space Hub Sutherland spaceport.

Mr MacNab believes that other sites, further away from populated or protected areas, may not have been given due consideration, as the council had already bought the land.

“A commercial developer wouldn’t ever have done that,” he says. “It all feeds into the idea that this was a done deal from the outset.”

Application process ‘should have been exemplary’

Furthermore, he says, the fact that the council was applying to itself for planning permission meant that “the whole process should have been exemplary” in order to maintain trust.

“It was the exact opposite,” he says.

The Comhairle says that the application was assessed “impartially and with the same level of scrutiny as would be afforded to an application made by any other applicant.”

“The application has been the subject of consultation with a significant number of specialist and statutory bodies.”

They also stressed the opinion of Scottish Government ministers that it was”not considered that the proposal raises issues that require a decision to be taken at a national level”.

‘Bring it out into the open’

As the plans for the spaceport go ahead, Friends of Scolpaig are considering their next move.

“We could go for a judicial review as [opposition groups] did in Sutherland, but that failed. And it means a costly process of going through the legal system.”

Construction for a spaceport in Sutherland began this year. The plans were taken to court by billionaire Anders Povlsen. If he couldn’t fight it, Friends of Scolpaig have little hope that they can.

Another option, Mr Macnab says, would be a formal petition to the Government for a public inquiry.

Over 1,000 people signed an earlier online petition from the group.

“We just want to bring it out into the open a bit more,” Mr MacNab says.

More local reporting from the Western Isles:

Conversation