Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘I thought my girl was going to die’: Landmark Adventure Park sued after rollercoaster crash injures two girls

The youngsters suffered neck injuries and continue to suffer psychological trauma.

The Runaway Timber Train ceased operation after the crash.
The Runaway Timber Train ceased operation after the crash.

Landmark Adventure Park is being sued after two young girls were injured when a rollercoaster derailed at the popular attraction.

Families of the girls have spoken out following the incident in August 2021 – and say they hope that court action against park bosses, Visitor Centres Ltd, will reveal what went wrong and will help improve the safety of other parks.

The organisation told The Press and Journal today that it was “surprised” to be included in legal proceedings, and say they were let down by an unnamed rollercoaster maintenance company.

Digby Brown Solicitors is representing the families affected and said there is “available evidence to show there were gaps in the safety process”.

Partner Mairi Day said: “It is only right that those responsible are held to account.”

Father thought daughter was ‘going to die’

Previously, the P&J reported how theme park goers heard a ‘massive bang’ after the crash on August 12 three years ago.

Police, fire and ambulance crews were called to the attraction near Carrbridge when the “family friendly” Runaway Timber Train crashed with 24 people on board.

In 2022, it was then confirmed that the rollercoaster would not open again.

Runaway Timber Train following the derailment which left two girls injured.

Speaking for the first time, the worried father of one of the girls recalled the trauma of only being able to watch as he saw his daughter caught up in the derailment.

The dad, who is not being named, said: “Me and the other parents could only look and shout as we saw our girls bashed around and thrown about while stuck inside the carriage.

“After about 30 seconds it all stopped with the carriage sort of hanging off the side.

“We could see our daughters were terrified and in pain but there was nothing we could do while they were trapped there.

“I genuinely thought my girl was going to die.”

Girls suffer from anxiety symptoms and flashbacks

Digby Brown says medics conducted x-rays on the girls which confirmed they suffered significant whiplash injuries.

Both girls, who are from the Scottish Borders, made a physical recovery but still experience anxiety symptoms and flashbacks, the company says.

The mother of the second injured girl added: “It was terrifying to feel so helpless when you know your child is in distress – I still feel that pain and anxiety today.

“Our sincere thanks go to the emergency workers and medical staff who cared for our children that day.

“The theme park told us nothing afterwards and neither has the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

“Here we are, three years later, and we are still being ignored – it’s all ludicrous and, frankly, does little to inspire trust or confidence.”

The rollercoaster was a family favourite at the theme park before the crash.

A HSE spokesperson said today: “Our sympathies are with anyone involved in incidents of this nature.

“We carried out a thorough criminal investigation which has now concluded. The threshold for prosecution is extremely high, and was not met on this occasion.

“We took enforcement action against another company relating to the testing of the ride.”

Rollercoaster received safety alert seven years before crash

Digby Brown Solicitors say that Landmark Adventure Park bosses deny liability and instead argue that the rollercoaster maintenance company is to blame.

Court papers allege the park received a safety alert seven years earlier in February 2014 from the manufacturer of the rollercoaster, when a potential crack in the main support shaft connected to the wheels was spotted following previous incidents in England and India.

Digby Brown say that there is no evidence of the park acting on this warning.

However, Visitor Centres Ltd insists it “acted” swiftly following the safety alert being issued.

A spokesperson for the organisation said: “The park passed the industry safety alert to the specialist contractor who confirmed that the annual Non Destructive Testing (NDT) testing which had already taken place that year was sufficient, and no additional action was required.”

They explained that NDT testing is a legal requirement which must be carried out every 12 months in accordance with industry guidance.

Landmark welcomes thousands of visitors each year

“This is a specialist process which is carried out by an independent contractor, who must be approved by the industry body. The contractor we used came highly recommended by our industry body,” they added.

The spokesperson said that they “very much regret this incident occurred”.

They reiterated that the HSE investigation resulted in no enforcement action, and that they carried out their own investigation.

They said it confirmed that the defect which contributed to the accident should “been detected by a specialist contractor” during an annual inspection.

Landmark will ‘robustly defend’ themselves

They said: “We provided an independent expert report to Digby Brown in December 2022 confirming the outcome of our investigation. We have heard nothing further from Digby Brown subsequently and are therefore surprised to be included in the court action which we will robustly defend.

“We note that Digby Brown have also raised court action against the specialist contractor.

“We were not placed under any restrictions regarding the operation of the rollercoaster following the accident. However, we made the decision not to operate the rollercoaster on our site following the accident and it is no longer on site.”

Conversation