Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Highland court cases triggered fresh “named person” row

Amanda Hardie (right) and her son Clyde Campbell
Amanda Hardie (right) and her son Clyde Campbell

High-profile court cases in the Highlands have triggered fresh debate over the controversial “named person” scheme in recent weeks.

The initiative – which is due to be rolled-out nationwide from August – has already been operating in the Highland Council area for eight years.

But opponents of the policy have questioned its effectiveness following tragic cases involving youngsters who had a state guardian appointed to oversee their welfare.

Last month, former Inverness model Amanda Hardie was jailed for leaving her son Clyde Campbell unattended and uncared for when she went to work at a city nightclub.

The toddler died from cot death and it emerged that Hardie, 31, had neglected him in the five months leading up to the tragedy.

The neglect went undetected – despite a form of the “named person” scheme already existing in the Highlands.

But the SNP claimed at the time that the case served to “underline the need” for such policies.

Just two weeks later the row resurfaced when it emerged that Fort Augustus woman Lanna Monaghan had used an electrified dog training collar on a toddler.

The Scottish Conservatives said the at the “appalling” case showed that the “named person” scheme was proving ineffective in the Highlands and should be abandoned immediately.

Drew Millar, the chairman of Highland Council’s education, children and adult and services committee, has issued a robust defence of the policy, however.

In a statement to councillors last month, he said: “As members will be aware from briefings, all evaluation and inspection over the last eight years makes clear that the practice model is proving to be highly effective in getting more early support to more children, and reducing the number of children with higher level needs.

“At a time when the number of looked after children, and the number of children at risk of harm, have been increasing across Scotland, they have been reducing in Highland because of the implementation of the named person role and other aspects of the Getting It Right For Every Child programme.”