Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Judge upholds Home Secretary’s decision to send couple home

Russell Felber
Russell Felber

A judge has upheld Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s decision to send home an American couple who have spent about £400,000 on their award-winning Inverness guesthouse.

Lady Carmichael ruled that the politician didn’t act unlawfully when she ruled that Russell and Ellen Felber didn’t meet legal requirements to remain in Scotland.

The New Yorkers had employed one person full-time at Torridon Guest House in Kenneth Street – but a rule change in 2014 meant they had not been employing enough people.

Last night, Mr Elber said both he and his wife were too “freaked out” by the outcome to comment on their next steps, which could involve the case going to a higher court.

The Felbers bought the guest house for £300,000 and spent another £100,000 on renovation – and it has since received rave reviews and awards.

Mrs Felber has became an active member of Inverness Cathedral’s bell ringing club and she was also taking Gaelic lessons.

The couple first came to Scotland in 2011 on a three-year visa which was extended by another two years, but when they applied for leave to remain in the UK in early 2016 the Home Office refused to grant the application.

And the Felbers received a letter in December from the Home Office telling them they had 30 days to leave the UK.

The Court of Session heard in May that the Home Office changed the rules on the number of employees that business people on entrepreneur visas in November 2014.

These new rules were devised after a decision was made to extend the Felbers’ visas.

Mr Felber’s lawyer, advocate Alan Caskie, argued that the home secretary should have applied her discretion and allowed the Felbers to remain, as the couple has acted in accordance with their visa requirements.

But yesterday, Lady Carmichael issued a written judgment which read: “The court’s function will usually be limited to reducing a decision that has been taken where a discretion has been found to have been exercised in an unlawful manner.

“It is normally outwith the proper scope of judicial review for the court to tell a public authority how it should exercise its discretion. While there may be cases where there could only be one possible outcome in the lawful exercise of discretion – this is not such a case.”