Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ironworks latest: Chaotic planning meeting sees hotel decision deferred – despite members branding it a ‘Lego’ build

After a series of delays, a decision is expected on a controversial hotel plan to replace the Ironworks.
After a series of delays, a decision is expected on a controversial hotel plan to replace the Ironworks.

Inverness’ popular Ironworks venue is safe – for now – after councillors delayed the hotel decision on a knife-edge vote.

Bricks Capital wants to demolish the Ironworks building and create a brand new, £30 million Courtyard by Marriott hotel on the site.

The controversial proposal attracted complaints from local residents, with some writing directly to councillors on the eve of the crunch planning meeting.

What followed next was chaotic. Not a single councillor spoke in favour of the application. Many branded it a “Lego design” that would “stick out like a sore thumb”.

Yet when it came to a straight approve or refuse vote, the majority voted to grant permission.

That decision was then tested against a motion to defer the decision completely, which won 11-3.

So the fate of the 155-bed hotel – and Inverness Ironworks – was left in limbo.

The Ironworks operators said later it is “business as usual” until they are told otherwise.

The Ironworks: the story so far

In December 2020, south planning committee unanimously rejected Bricks Capital’s hotel application, calling it “monolithic” and “devoid of architectural quality”.

However, the developer went back to the drawing board and won over council planners with an entirely new set of designs. The new look also found favour with the Inverness Design Panel, made up of local professionals.

Even Historic Environment Scotland did not object to the designs.

But councillors remained unconvinced at Thursday’s meeting.

Councillor Isabelle Mackenzie with husband Donald.
Councillor Isabelle Mackenzie (pictured here with husband Donald) said the hotel plan is not in keeping with the historic nature of the city centre. Picture: Sandy McCook

Councillor Isabelle Mackenzie called the hotel “too large, too high and sticking out like a sore thumb”.

Ms Mackenzie said it would tower over the skyline, and leave the city with “more concrete and more cement”.

‘Designed in the Soviet era, with a box of Lego’

Other members asked about the logistics, such as bin collection and car parking.

Councillor Michael Cameron referenced concerns from the council’s transport planning team regarding servicing arrangements. Officers told Mr Cameron the developer has since agreed to do all the servicing from the back entrance on Manse Place instead of Rose Street.

Mr Cameron said this was “new information” that should have been included in the committee report. At this point, he proposed to defer a decision until members had time to reconsider.

Other members in the chamber raised concerns about bin collection, car parking and traffic congestion.

However, the overriding concern was the design of the building itself.

Other hotel plans in the city have in recent years caused debate because of their designs.

Councillor Bill Lobban demanded: “How many times must we consider hotel applications that look like they’ve been designed in the Soviet era with a box of Lego?”

Artist impression of the proposed Marriott Courtyard on Academy Street, Inverness.
Artist impression of the proposed Marriott Courtyard on Academy Street, Inverness. Picture: Bricks Capital

Councillors Laurie Fraser, Ken Gowans and Andrew Mackintosh all said the development doesn’t suit the city.

Chairman Thomas MacLennan – newly elected this morning – reminded members that design is subjective. He added that this is the second set of plans to come to committee, and they are recommended for approval.

The Ironworks itself didn’t feature heavily in the debate, because planners emphasised that this was a “commercial matter” outwith the remit of the council.

A complicated vote

With Mr Cameron’s amendment on the table, the chairman suggested the committee move to vote.

Laurie Fraser intercepted, arguing that a decision should be made today.  After a short break, Mr Fraser and Ms Mackenzie returned with an amendment to reject the application.

Their amendment stated that the hotel would compromise the history and culture of the conservation area. It represented an “over-development” of the site, and would have an “unacceptable impact” on the city.

Cue another attempt to vote, and this time it was Mr Lobban who interrupted.

Despite his earlier criticisms, Mr Lobban asked the chairman if there was to be no amendment in support of the development.

Mr MacLennan agreed to table an amendment to grant planning permission, calling it the “ultimate test”.

The Ironworks in Academy Street, Inverness.
The Ironworks in Academy Street, Inverness. Picture by Sandy McCook.

Surprisingly, given the tone of the debate, members voted 7-6 to approve the application.

However, according to council procedures the winning amendment then goes up against the motion. Asked to vote to approve or defer, councillors voted 11-3 to defer.

This means no decision will be made today. The hotel will have another lengthy wait, and the fate of the Ironworks still hangs in the balance.

Open for business

Ironworks’ venue director Caroline Campbell said: “We remain very much open for business as usual until we are advised otherwise and have some fantastic programming in the coming months.

“So, we look forward to seeing audiences continue to visit us on Academy Street.

“We will continue to promote and deliver our upcoming events with tickets remaining valid and fully protected, so please continue to book.

“We’d like to sincerely thank our customers, staff, performers, suppliers and industry partners for all their support at this time and for helping us create something we should all be incredibly proud of.”

A spokesman for Bricks Group said: “We’re naturally disappointed that the application recommended by council officials has been deferred, but we’ll be happy to liaise on any queries members may have.

The proposed Marriott Courtyard on Academy Street.
The proposed Marriott Courtyard on Academy Street.

“This is a £30 million inward investment, the biggest on the horizon for the city centre, with 100 construction jobs and 65 permanent ones, so it could be beneficial to Inverness’s post-pandemic future.

“We look forward to engaging with the council in the hope of securing a positive decision in due course.”

Over its 14 years the Ironworks has hosted acts including Kasabian, Runrig, Van Morrison, Babyshambles, and Biffy Clyro.

The Ironworks emerged from discussions following Inverness being made a city in 2000.

It was felt it needed a dedicated live music venue similar to those in other Scottish cities.

Remembering some great acts at the Ironworks

Are you interested in more exclusive and breaking Highland and Islands news from the P&J? If so, why not join our dedicated Facebook page HERE

Conversation