Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Decision day after community vote on windfarm

Artist impression: What the proposed Black Isle turbines might look like according to the protestors
Artist impression: What the proposed Black Isle turbines might look like according to the protestors

The result of a ballot to decide if a controversial community scale windfarm should be given the go-ahead in a Black Isle forest will be revealed tomorrow.

The vote closed at noon today and counting started this morning at the electoral reform offices in England. The result will be announced by Highland Council’s returning officer later this afternoon.

The 6.9MW capacity scheme proposed by Black Isle Community Energy (Bice) would have three 328ft towers in Millbuie Forest near Mount Eagle, if successful.

A Yes vote in the ballot won’t necessarily lead to turbines being erected because the planning application would still have to be processed.

Campaign group No Black Isle Windfarm (NBIW) first raised concerns about Bice’s predicted £500,000 annual income from the scheme, claiming it was “wrong” because it was based on overestimated wind speed estimates.

The group also raised concerns about the scheme’s impact on nearby red kite, osprey, capercaillie, Scottish wildcat and pine marten populations.

Bice maintain that the predicted financial benefit is a realistic figure and that claims about the impact on species are premature. They argue that the best way to know more about the impact is to take the project forward and conduct surveys.

More recently, a row erupted over the ballot itself when voting papers were sent out that also contained background information on the proposal.

NBIW claims that the leaflet contained unbalanced information which could have swayed opinion and is angry this happened when £150,000 of public money is set to be loaned by the Scottish Government’s CARES Scheme to take proposals forward in the event of a Yes vote.

Bice in turn claimed that the correct process was followed for producing the ballot – in that it has been assessed by Forestry Commission Scotland, local community councils and Highland Council’s returning officer.

Under the National Forest Land Scheme, the applicant is able to take control of the ballot but any information included has an obligation to be balanced.