Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Report is an ’embarrassment’ to Highland Council

Audit Scotland said that more regular updates should have been given on the Inverness West Link
Audit Scotland said that more regular updates should have been given on the Inverness West Link

A powerful watchdog body has discovered Highland councillors are being starved of the vital information they need to make key decisions on multimillion-pound projects.

Audit Scotland’s scathing report on the local authority’s handling of its finances has been branded an “embarrassment” by a senior member of the council.

It was published just weeks after councillors agreed their spending programme for the next five years.

It contains developments worth more than £900million – including the highly controversial Inverness West Link road and numerous new schools.

Highland Council

Last night, an arch critic of the West Link scheme said the Audit Scotland report was a “damning indictment” of the council’s handling of the road project.

The influential body said Highland Council members were unable to properly challenge and scrutinise multimillion-pound construction schemes because they did not get enough detail from officials.

It also claimed the local authority did not have “adequate systems and controls in place to ensure the proper administration of its financial affairs”.

And it found the council failed to examine the outcome of projects and learn lessons from its successes and mistakes.

Councillor Margaret Davidson, chairwoman of the audit and scrutiny committee, said that ongoing monitoring of the various multimillion-pound contracts was “very poor”.

She said that the Audit Scotland report, which outlines an action plan for improvement, was “embarrassing” for the local authority.

She added: “I believe there wasn’t nearly enough debate about the capital programme. Part of that is insufficient information for us to scrutinise.

“We should be doing more.”

Her comments were supported by other committee members when they met in Inverness yesterday.

Councillor Donnie Kerr said the lack of information was “incredibly worrying”.

He cited the River Ness Flood Alleviation Scheme as an example of a project which had provoked a raft of complaints from businesses.

He said after the meeting that he felt that the cost of the scheme would have increased by the time it was completed.

And Mr Kerr said the cost of the Inverness West Link could also be “disastrous” if not monitored closely.

Audit Scotland also highlight the project in its report, and said an 18-month gap between updates on costs was too long.

Steven Boyle, assistant director of Audit Scotland, said: “We would have expected to see more regular reports on the cost of the Inverness West Link.”

There were calls for more financial training for councillors, including on the implications of long-term borrowing to fund the projects.

As well as comments on a lack of information during projects, the document criticised the council for failing to produce reports when projects were finished.

It said that while debriefs were carried out by the development and infrastructure service, these did not assess whether the benefits predicted in the business case were achieved.

The results of the reviews are also not shared with other services or with Highland councillors.

Councillor Angela Maclean said: “We keep saying we are going to learn the lessons but we do not seem to be learning the lessons and we make the same mistakes over and over again.”

Yesterday, Stuart Black, director of development and infrastructure, said: “We always have capital monitoring reports at committees and it is always open to members to ask questions.

“But we recognise that we have to improve that.”

He added that he was in “robust” discussions with Morgan Sindall, the flood scheme contractor, over the ongoing work.