Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Academy Street survey: Inverness businesses brand proposals ‘unworkable and catastrophic’

Traders think the controversial proposals are "hare-brained".

A selection of quotes in blue and yellow speech bubbles on a grey background of Academy Street
Businesses have given their views on the Academy Street plans.

Inverness city centre businesses want a reset on the controversial plans for Academy Street.

The Press and Journal conducted a survey with Inverness BID to ask what should happen after Highland Council’s decision to appeal a recent court ruling which branded its consultation unlawful.

The results show a majority wants the council to go back to the drawing board.

If you haven’t seen it already, our main story is in the links at the bottom of the page, along with an analysis of what it all means.

The survey asked four questions and the 90 businesses who responded answered them – sometimes in unexpected ways.

Some of their comments and ideas are below – all anonymous.

The survey was held following Highland Council’s appeal to a legal ruling on the traffic plans. Image Sandy McCook/DC Thomson

‘Unworkable and catastrophic to retail’

Our first question covered whether the council current plan – to remove through traffic – was worth more discussion.

The reactions were strong.

One business said: “The current proposal in practice would be unworkable and catastrophic to retail and hospitality.”

Another worried about how nearby areas would cope.

They added: “The knock-on effects of this will drive foot fall and customers away from the city centre. The diverted traffic through Crown is not safe.

“Those roads are small enough as it is, as well as having a school and church.

“There can’t be more added traffic to that area.

The scheme aims to shift the focus in Academy Street away from driving

Others used even stronger language.

One said: “Move on, it’s been opposed by so many people and businesses, it’s quite obviously not right for the city.”

They called for a better plan that involved improving bus schedules, park and rides and car parking.

And one last commenter summed up what many people seem to feel.

They said: “The plans they are ramming ahead with are the problem. The impact assessments show it is a terrible idea.

“These proposals are dead in the water.”

‘Stop flogging a dead horse’

Our second question asked whether businesses wanted the council to go back to the drawing board.

Again the response was overwhelmingly yes.

One respondent said it was “the only sensible thing to do.

They added: “The council needs to stop flogging a dead horse.”

Another said: “Inverness is a very small city. Closing the only cross centre arterial route will by default create havoc elsewhere in the city.”

The Academy Street plans are aimed at regenerating the city centre.

‘It’s an eyesore’

We also asked if businesses wanted the council to just leave Academy Street as it is.

Interestingly, there was acknowledgment that something needed to change.

One said: “There definitely can be improvements made to Academy Street, but this isn’t the right choice.”

The plans were subject to a legal challenge

There were stronger comments, too, with one participant offering some suggestions that might help.

They said: “Academy Street is an eyesore, plus quite dangerous with these stupid bollards still in place. We need to get all shop fronts cleaned up, resurface the roads and move the taxi stand to the bus station.”

‘Hare-brained scheme’

Lastly, we asked if people wanted an inquiry or review into what had happened so far.

One said: “Yes, as a lot of tax-payers money would have been wasted on this hare-brained scheme.”

Another branded it “a total mess“,  adding: “This can’t be repeated.”

One weighed in: “It’s been extremely stressful and time-consuming for us to have to fight the council. This is no way to treat people or businesses.

The council wants to reduce traffic in the city centre. Image Sandy McCook/DC Thomson

Someone else agreed: “The unwillingness of the council to listen to the people, business and professionals, is shocking. Why were they not willing to listen to businesses who may face closure?

Our livelihood is at stake. We’re not dispensable. Our businesses are key to a thriving city centre and provide jobs and income for the community.”

More on our Academy Street survey

Academy Street survey: Businesses say ‘no, thanks’ to controversial traffic plan

After two years of bickering, the Academy Street debate has left us dizzy

Conversation