Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

High court judge says sorry to family who sued Raigmore Hospital for £10.5 million

Rowan MacLeod & mum Jacqueline
Rowan MacLeod & mum Jacqueline

The parents of a brain damaged teenager who sued doctors for £10.5 million have received an apology for the time it took for a judge to issue his decision.

Jacqueline and Andrew MacLeod failed in their bid to prove that doctors at Raigmore Hospital in Inverness acted negligently when delivering daughter Rowan in June 1999.

The little girl is said to have suffered brain damage after being born. She now has cerebral palsy and is completely dependent on her family for everything.

Judge Lord Kinclaven took almost a year to issue his decision that lawyers acting for the couple hadn’t proven that medics acted incorrectly.

However, the family’s legal team returned to the Court of Session to argue that Lord Kinclaven took too long to issue his opinion.

They also argued that his decision demonstrated “that he had an adequate grasp of the relevant medical science to make his findings in fact”.

The family’s lawyers also claimed that the judge gave “little or no explanation as to why he preferred certain expert evidence.”

They claimed that the case needed to be heard again before a new judge. On Thursday, judges Lord Brodie, Lady Dorrian and Lord Drummond Young ruled that their brother judge acted correctly in dismissing the compensation claim.

However, the appeal judges ruled that Lord Kinclaven took too long to issue his opinion. In an opinion issued at the Edinburgh based court,

Lord Brodie wrote: “We accept that the time taken for the issue of the Lord Ordinary’s opinion was excessive.

“The pursuer’s seek no specific remedy in respect of that but we consider that they, and the defender, should have an apology from the court for what was its failure to ensure that an opinion was issued within a reasonable time.

“The Lord Ordinary, (NOTE TO SUBS – legal expression used to describe civil judge who first hears the case) quite deliberately as it would appear, adopted what we have described as a terse style of expression. “Generally speaking, a succinct judgement is to be commended but in this case that was achieved at the expense of sufficient explanation of the various conclusions that the Lord Ordinary reached.

“The argument came to be: because the Lord Ordinary did not properly explain himself his conclusions must be set aside and the proof must be heard over again.

“However, that brought them face to face with what proved to be the insurmountable hurdle that it simply not how our appellate process is conducted. “Thus, while the reason why the pursuer’s case fails can be described as a procedural difficulty, in truth the difficulty appears to us to be more substantive.”

The appeal opinion tells of how Rowan, who lives with her family in Fort William, was born in the early hours of June 2 1999. Lawyers acting for her family claimed that the medics who delivered her acted negligently during the birth.

They claimed that medical staff at Raigmore didn’t monitor Rowan properly during the birth. It was also claimed that she suffered brain damage as a consequence of the actions of the medical team.. Lawyers acting for Highland Health Board – the organisation responsible for Raigmore – claimed that doctors acted correctly.

They claimed that Rowan’s mother was a diabetic and that diabetes is “associated with significantly higher incidents of foetal abnormality and morbidity.” Evidence was led during a 22 days of proceedings at the Court of Session in 2012.

Following the case, lawyers in the case addressed Lord Kinclaven. The judge told the lawyers in the case that he would issue his opinion at a later date on February 7 2013. He didn’t issue his opinion until January 2014.

The judge concluded that the family hadn’t proven their case that medics had acted wrongly. Lawyers acting for the family wanted the appeal judges to order that the compensation case be heard again. However, the appeal judges ruled that there wasn’t a legal need for the case to be heard again. Lord Brodie wrote: “The pursuer’s case cannot succeed. The reclaiming motion is refused