Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fury over turbines ‘feeding frenzy’ on Speyside

George Heraghty and Mark Holdsworth from Save Wild Moray
George Heraghty and Mark Holdsworth from Save Wild Moray

Campaigners fear the Moray landscape will be ravaged if plans for a new 29-turbine wind farm are allowed to go ahead.

Energy giant Fred Olson Renewables is behind the latest green energy proposal for Scotland’s whisky tourism heartland.

It’s Rothes III proposal – boasting towers over 700 metres tall – would sit alongside the existing Rothes I and II sites and bring the development ever closer to Rothes itself.

The plans have been greeted with anger by local wind farm campaigners, who believe the Moray landscape is already saturated with turbines and cannot have any more installed.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


Statistics have shown that Moray is 0.9% of the UK land area but may soon boast 10.9% of all UK turbines.

Opponents have said Rothes III will only “add to the deterioration” of the landscape, claiming the upper Lossie valley has been caught in a “feeding-frenzy”.

They have appealed to the Scottish Government to block it.

George Heraghty is a member of Save Wild Moray, which was established by concerned locals to stop projects from spoiling the region’s scenery and harming its wildlife.

He said: “The turbines are creeping ever more closer towards Rothes itself and these will be to the east of the ones already extremely visible from the Elgin area.

“It is being presented as an extension of the existing Rothes I and II developments (of 40 turbines) but this will scar Speyside beyond belief.

“It will be visible from many corners of Moray and will dominate views from Ben Rinnes, the most important landmark hill in all of Moray.”

“They will only add to the deterioration of the Moray landscape.

“Visitors come to expect the finest landscapes and end up being stuck looking at wind turbines.”

The new proposals are just one of several plans submitted to the Scottish Government in recent years to build more turbines in the area.

The objection period for Clashgour wind farm, which could lead to 47 turbines up to 575ft tall being built about seven miles south of Forres, closed earlier this month.

Final plans have also been submitted for the Pauls Hill II wind farm near Knockando, which would include seven turbines up to 500ft tall.

Fellow Save Wild Moray member, Mark Holdsworth, added: “We are appalled by this.

“It seems to be a feeding frenzy in the upper Lossie valley with four live developments 100 yards from each other.

“If they all go ahead, it is the absolute end for a beautiful area, and if it keeps going like the wild landscape will completely disappear.

“Moray councillors and politicians need to show some vision and backbone and stop this before its too late.”

The Scottish Government has stressed that renewable energy projects help create jobs, boost the economy and contribute to climate change targets.

A spokesman said: “All wind farm planning applications must meet strict planning criteria.

“We are committed to delivering a planning system that works for everyone, ensuring local communities have their say.”

A Scottish Government spokesman added: “The Scottish Government’s Energy Consent Unit currently have three wind farm applications under consideration in the Moray Council planning authority area, Rothes III Extension, Clash Gour and Paul’s Hill II.

“Decisions will be taken in due course once the required consultation periods, and any resultant public local inquiries, have concluded, with ministers taking account of all responses and representations before making a determination.”