Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Elgin link road will not be treated differently

Douglas Ross on Ladyhill in Elgin
Douglas Ross on Ladyhill in Elgin

Elgin’s controversial link road will not get special treatment in the planning process, it was decided yesterday.

A bid was launched to have the application heard by all 26 of Moray’s elected councillors given the contentious nature of the proposals.

However, a motion to secure the wider hearing, led by Councillor John Cowe (independent) was defeated yesterday.

The 13 members of the planning committee will decide on the link road’s fate as a result.

The proposed £8.5million road will directly connect Elgin’s Edgar Road retail park to the A96 Inverness to Aberdeen route.

Yesterday’s decision not to change the procedure – which was taken by a vote of 16-9 councillors – was welcomed by those who do not want the route.

Jim Wiseman, who is part of the Designing Streets Action Group set up to fight the scheme, said: “I think it’s only right that the road application is decided by the planning committee.”

Commenting after the meeting, Douglas Ross, chairman of the planning committe, said: “I think it would have sent out completely the wrong message to treat this one controversial application differently from every other application.

“Many previous applications, including all the major flood schemes in Moray which cost a combined £180million, were heard by the planning committee.

“If these infrastructure projects did not merit going to the full council, why should a link road be treated differently?

“It will now come to the planning committee and members will have to view the application solely on the planning merits of the proposal.

“No matter what the result, I hope the public will now feel more assured that the proper process has been followed.”

Prior to the vote, several councillors had expressed concerns about the time required to provide training so that every member would have a working knowledge of the planning laws.

In addition, the issue was also raised of whether a member of the public might bring a costly legal challenge against the council if the procedure was changed.

The planning committee was due to hear the link road application on June 17.

However, this date has now been put back to later in the summer due to delays in the consultation process.