Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Major survey on gull habits planned as Moray Council gears up for its annual battle

Gulls in Moray. Image: Jason Hedges.
Gulls in Moray. Image: Jason Hedges.

Moray councillors are set to discuss plans to tackle problems with gulls, but communities blighted by them are unlikely to have the issue resolved any time soon.

Towns including Elgin, Forres and Buckie are experiencing problems with the creatures creating noise and droppings, as well as attacking people.

With gull numbers on the decline nationally they are regarded as a protected species, and a licence is required to have nests and eggs removed from properties.

But changes to the process by NatureScot means building owners will have to show they have introduced preventative measures such as placing spikes on their roofs before a licence is granted.

Have other measures used elsewhere in Scotland worked?

Members of the full Moray Council will discuss current arrangements for dealing with urban gulls, what further actions can be taken and the cost implications of that at a meeting this week.

Gulls gathering at Doocot Park in Elgin.

In his report, head of development services Jim Grant explained extensive gull control measures carried out by another Scottish local authority did not reduce bird numbers.

Mr Grant said: “The surveys undertaken by Dumfries and Galloway Council have identified that the gull population has not reduced in over 10 years of nest and egg removal.

“It would appear that the various interventions have displaced the gulls’ breeding from the centre to more residential areas of the town.

“To be effective, any programme of gull control needs to employ a range of methodologies and to be carried out over a number of years.

“Even with such a programmed approach, other local authority gull control operations have demonstrated the interventions did not reduce the population and moved gulls around potentially into more sensitive areas.”

£44,000 for gull-proof bins

Councillors will be asked to agree:

  • To undertake a major survey on urban gull habits
  • Continued rollout of gull-proof bins in Cullen, Elgin, Buckie, Forres and Findhorn
  • A public education programme discouraging people from feeding them and promoting the use of nesting prevention measures.

Installing the bins is expected to cost £44,000 with £2,000 for the education campaign.

The gull survey would form part of a wider report covering the north-east and involving other local authorities.  It would take a detailed look at species, breeding locations, roosting, feeding and the habits of juveniles and adult birds over a four-year period.

But at a total cost of £480,000 – £160,000 for Moray – it is not expected to start soon.

Projects to disrupt gulls in some areas of Elgin and Pilmuir in Forres last year saw 175 nests and 441 eggs removed, with 20 chicks taken to the Ellon Bird Sanctuary.

Elgin and Forres  Common Good Funds gave £20,000 and £1,300 respectively for the projects with a further private donation of £2,000 given to cover residential properties in Forres.

Gull survey unlikely to start soon

Laser disruption of the birds could go ahead in Elgin and Forres again this year if external funding is available.

However, the move is not considered to be cost effective.

Mr Grant said: “It is questionable whether disruption provides value for money while other measures are constrained.

“Whilst local members may consider this activity to provide some relief for residents such that common good and other external funding may reasonably be used for this purpose, this is not recommended by officers at present.”

Councillors will discuss the issues at the meeting on Wednesday.