Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fresh concerns raised over Typhoon safety

RAF Typhoon from RAF Lossiemouth
RAF Typhoon from RAF Lossiemouth

The Ministry of Defence has been accused of taking a “reactive” approach to risk as fresh concerns were raised over the operation of Moray-based fighter jets while they are not fitted with anti-crash systems.

A leading flight safety campaigner has unearthed a document in which a senior RAF officer warns the absence of a collision warning system (CWS) in the UK’s Typhoon fleet “does not align with civilian safety standards”.

Forres resident and retired RAF engineering officer Jimmy Jones, who obtained the safety statement dated December via a freedom of information request, called the remark “striking”.

He said: “They are admitting by that statement that it’s not up to standard and that fitting CWS would improve safety.

“The way the MoD deals with risk is reactive rather than proactive. They will act when something happens, but as long as they can get away with it, they will.”

The issue has been a longstanding concern, particularly since the failure to install a CWS was found to be one of the factors contributing to the 2012 Tornado crash over the Moray Firth, which resulted in the deaths of three Lossiemouth airmen and left a fourth seriously injured.

Mr Jones, 74, also criticised the officer, whose full name is not given, for concluding the air safety risk to life associated with the Typhoon fleet’s routine operation is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) but then referring to figures suggesting it would decrease if CWS was fitted.

In a footnote the officer states the risk of a mid-air collision from a Typhoon to a commercial aircraft, estimated to be 1/680 annually, would drop to approximately 1/5,000.

Mr Jones said: “It is a bit like saying my car is safe to operate on the road despite the fact that seat belts are not fitted, but I intend fitting them sometime in the future.”

Angus Robertson, Westminster SNP leader and Moray MP, added: “Safety must come first for MoD personnel and civilians underneath the flight path of fast jets.”

A spokesman for the RAF insisted it took flight safety “extremely seriously” and was constantly working to ensure all the appropriate safety measures are in place.

He added: “Operation of the Typhoon aircraft complies with the MoD’s own military aircraft authority regulations.

“A Typhoon CWS technical demonstration programme has been completed and we await formal observations against the key user requirements and recommendations on suitability for roll-out across the Typhoon fleet.”