Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scotland to set up independent ‘green ports’ after row over UK freeports

The Scottish Government has declared it will set up its own “green ports” after accusing UK ministers of failing to provide guarantees about fair pay and set-up funding.

Scotland’s Trade Minister, Ivan McKee, announced plans to set up independent freeports that may offer tax breaks and incentives, rather than aligning with the model for other UK sites.

Mr McKee accused the UK Government of trying to “dilute a strong commitment to fair work” by not committing to pay the real living wage of £9.50 an hour as well as other net-zero conditions.

He had previously insisted that the Scottish Government would not support the freeport plans without commitments for fair work and certain commitments relating to net-zero targets.

Under the proposed agreement, which now appears to have been abandoned, Scottish ministers wanted two “green ports” that would be special economic zones offering tax breaks and lower tariffs for businesses as a part of the UK Government’s “levelling up” agenda.

The Scottish Government does not have the legal power to exempt goods from tariffs as it is a reserved policy area so cannot be included in any Scotland-specific green port model.

The Secretary of State for Scotland, Alister Jack, had argued that if Scotland were to develop the freeports alone, the Scottish Government would only have enough funding for one site and tax rules would leave Scotland’s versions at a competitive disadvantage.

But Mr McKee has now said the conditions he imposed – that operators must have fair work practices and contribute to the transition to net-zero carbon emissions – have not been met.

A letter from Mr Jack to Mr McKee sets out the UK Government’s offer for Scottish freeports but explicitly states that any reference to the real living wage be removed from any bidding requirements.

The “very generous offer” included tax relief of up to £120 million over five years at the two sites, with capital allowances, employers’ national insurance contributions and customs benefits set to be exempt from tax, Mr Jack said.

Funding would have been allocated through the Barnett formula, with approximately £5 million having already been provided to the Scottish Government and an additional £13 million anticipated to set the projects up.

Mr Jack added that the location of the freeports would have been based on a “robust and impartial assessment of bids”, with a Scottish Government minister invited to sit on the decision panel.

The Scottish Secretary’s letter stated: “We have an outstanding opportunity before us to work together to deliver a programme with huge potential to grow the Scottish economy and create high-quality jobs.

“I believe the people of Scotland will be unforgiving if we fail to seize it. The consequences of us not working together are clear. Firstly, our chances of delivering two freeports rather than one are vastly reduced.

“Should the Scottish Government not agree to become an investing partner in the scheme, the strong likelihood is that the seed capital available would support the creation of only one freeport.

Commenting on the Scottish Government’s decision to reject the offer, Mr McKee said: “I have been clear that any model implemented in Scotland must include a firm commitment to conditionality around fair work and net zero. These are central tenets of Scotland’s future economy and principles we cannot compromise on.

“The UK Government’s offer does not reflect this, provide fair set-up funding or, indeed, recognise the vital role the real living wage plays in secure pay and employment contracts.

“It is difficult to comprehend why UK Ministers would seek to dilute a strong commitment to fair work, including payment of the real living wage, when seeking to implement their freeport policy in Scotland.

“With just weeks to go before Cop26, the UK Government should be working with us to help deliver a net-zero economy given both the Scottish and UK Government have statutory targets to meet on reducing our carbon emissions.

“The Scottish Government, therefore, has no option but to take forward plans to further develop our green port model which meet the specific needs of Scotland’s economy.”

In response, a UK Government spokeswoman said: “The UK Government’s freeport model embraces the highest employment and environmental standards.

“It is disappointing that despite strenuous efforts to work together, the Scottish Government is choosing not to work with us to bring freeports to Scotland.

“There is a strong appetite from businesses and it would boost the economy and create jobs.

“We will continue to work to ensure that Scotland can enjoy the benefits of the model.”

This article originally appeared on the Evening Express website. For more information, read about our new combined website.