Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Revealed: Top reasons Aberdeen City Council let drivers off with Union Street bus gate fines… and incorrect signage isn’t one of them

Most Union Street bus gate appeals have not been successful
One of the altered Union Street bus gate signs. This one outside the tourist information on Union Street used to read "200 yards". Picture by Kami Thomson.

Thousands of drivers have been fined for going through Union Street’s bus gate, but there are a lucky few who have successfully appealed and got their money back.

Though they are in the minority, we asked Aberdeen City Council for the most common reasons these individuals had their bus gate fines overturned.

Here’s what they said:

Taxis, deliveries and roadworks…

Anyone taking a non-permitted vehicle through the bus gate on Union Street will be issued with an automatic £60 fine, which can be reduced to £30 if paid promptly.

The council allows people to appeal these fines within 28 days if the driver believes the fine should not have been issued.

According to Aberdeen City Council, the most common reasons appeals were upheld include proof the vehicle was used as a taxi or was making a delivery in the area.

Making deliveries is an acepted reason for appealing a union street bus gate fine
Making deliveries on this stretch of road is an accepted reason by the council to appeal a bus gate fine. Picture by Kami Thomson.

Other reasons appeals have been allowed include occasions where drivers have been directed to use the bus gate due to road closures elsewhere on the road network, or if they were carrying out some kind of utility or emergency works within the area covered by the bus gate.

However, among the top reasons the city council told us they upheld complaints, there is no mention of appeals being upheld due to incorrect signage which was installed by the council and recently rectified.

Reasons for rejections of appeals

The council says one of the most common reasons for appeals to be rejected is where customers “claim they are following their sat-nav and ignored street signage in place.”

Another common reason for rejection is where no evidence to support a claim has been provided.

Union street top of market street view
The Union Street bus gate at the top of Market Street. Picture by Wullie Marr.

“I have to sympathise with the council in that complaining without evidence is never going to work, and saying that the sat nav directed a driver through the bus gate is just plain silly,” said Luke Bosdet, a spokesman for the AA.

“However, where large numbers of drivers fail to heed the restriction and get a fine, the council needs to consider why that might be and reinforce the signage and directions if necessary.

“Of course, it could be that they know that drivers regularly get caught out and the fines income is just too lucrative for them to want to do anything about it.”

How many people have successfully appealed?

We asked Aberdeen City Council how many appeals it received between July and December of last year, when 42,000 drivers were recorded going through the bus gate on Union Street.

The authority told us that 2,342 appeals were submitted in total.

Three-quarters of these were rejected, with just 607 appeals upheld.

The council has updated its bus lane appeals page online to include specific detail about the Union Street traffic measures.

The Majority of Union street bus gate appeals have been rejected.
Union Street bus gate Picture by Kath Flannery.

It states that the council “wish to clarify that distance signs installed alongside bus lane and bus gate signage has not affected the validity of any charges applied to motorists.”

“The council accepts that two distance signs, on Union Street and Market Street, were not accurate and thanks the public for bringing this to our attention.”

The message continues by stating that these issues have been rectified and that members of the public are welcome to appeal any fines within 28 days of receipt of that charge and that any appeal will be considered on a case-by-case basis.


Have you been unfairly fined by the bus gate on Union Street? Tell us in the comments section below


Is there anything I can do if my appeal was rejected?

It’s a tricky question and the law seems a little bit vague on the issue.

For starters, it’s more difficult to appeal a fine you have already paid as the council will consider the payment as you admitting you were in the wrong.

However, if you’ve not paid and your local council still doesn’t accept your appeal you can take the matter further and appeal to a bus lane tribunal, according to AA spokesman Luke.

That is usually where complaints about signage in particular – like inadequate signage, bad road layout and faded road markings – tend to be proven, he said.

Union street bus gate camera
Reader Debbie Nobel’s sent in this image of her campervan pictured at the front of the queue at the bus gate.

However in the case of bus gates appeals specifically, tribunals may not be the answer.

Stuart Beveridge is a criminal defence lawyer at Grant Smith Law Practice in Aberdeen and explained that incorrect or poor signage is not currently a legal defence when it comes to bus gate appeals.

“Unfortunately the way the law is currently written, any bus gate appeal to the tribunal can’t be on the basis of signage,” he said.

“It is strange however that someone can appeal on the basis of incorrect signage for parking offences but not bus lane offences.”

He said that drivers can only rely on the “goodwill” of the council if this is their defence.

We’re looking for people who feel they have been unfairly penalised by the Union Street bus gate to speak out as part of our efforts to hold the council to account. Would you like to help?

Email us at environmentandtransport@ajl.co.uk with your experience of being fined, and why you think it was unfair.

Read more about Union Street bus gate appeals:

Conversation