Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Lossiemouth campaign hits roadblock

Post Thumbnail

Local authority officials were under fire yesterday after backing controversial plans for an access road to a housing development.

Developer Tulloch of Cummingston wants to use a route which passes quiet residential cul-de-sacs in the coastal town to reach its 278 home development in Lossiemouth’s Sunbank area.

Protestors have fought the proposals since they were unveiled last year – but Moray Council’s roads and transport department has decided not to object to them, as long as traffic calming measures are introduced.

The developer plans to use roads at Halliman Way and Fisher Place to reach the port’s Boyd Anderson Drive.

The Stop the Boyd Anderson Drive (BAD) Access group has accused the local authority of ignoring resident’s views by not ordering the builder to revise its plans.

Campaigner Robert Murdoch said: “We don’t really feel the council are being fair with us.

“I understand the local authority’s desire to get more housing built as soon as they can, but by adopting this route they are impinging on the quality of life of the people who live in those cul-de-sacs.

“I don’t feel the council officers who recommended the plan have taken our objections into account.”

Last month, Stop the BAD Access group members urged Tulloch of Cummingston to revise its proposal and claimed the carriageway at Halliman Way, which the company hopes to incorporate into the route, was not wide enough to be used as an access as it measures only 16.6ft.

The group said that, according to legislation, the road would need to be 18ft wide.

But the findings were not addressed in the report by council officials.

A Moray Council spokesman said: “The plan has been examined by officers, and it’s expected that developers will explore further options at the planning stage.

“As a matter of policy Moray Council would not consult with the public

regarding traffic calming measures as they are not part of the site.

“There will be public consultation on detailed roadworks proposals when they are submitted.”