Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Bell: The longer the SNP wait to resolve independence issues the more it looks like they don’t have the answers

Nicola Sturgeon returns to Bute House after the 2021 Scottish elections
Nicola Sturgeon returns to Bute House after the 2021 Scottish elections

The settled will of the people? They don’t like Alex Salmond. Beyond that, who knows?

It’s a major problem for Scotland. The impasse between Edinburgh and London on Indyref2 restricts our national debate to the narrow confines of the constitution. We’ve been here for 14 years, and that’s not good.

Alex Bell

Since 2007, our education standards have slipped, poverty is on the rise, our ranking in global wealth has fallen and economic growth is down. Include an exhausted NHS and an ageing population and things look miserable.

This decline has many factors beyond SNP governance but it requires an honest discussion which can’t happen while the union question remains unsolved.

The SNP’s focus since the election has been to suggests it is Boris Johnson who must act, by making a second independence referendum legal.

The implication is that something happened at the ballot box last Thursday (May 6) which makes this imperative. In fact, not much changed.

Comfort in numbers

The 2021 election returned a pro-independence majority of greens and the SNP. The same result, bar a couple of extra MSPs, as in 2016.

Winning a fourth term is impressive, while increasing vote on an increased turnout. The SNP are good at parliamentary elections – light years beyond rivals.

As for the Tories in 1951, or Labour in the 1980s and 1990s, nearly half of us voted SNP in 2021. We tend to pile in on one party. There’s comfort in numbers.

SNP ballot papers at the count in Glasgow

However, just as in 2016, and the 2017 and 2019 UK elections, the SNP went out of its way to deny a vote for them was a vote for independence.

Five years ago, Nicola Sturgeon said in a BBC debate: “You don’t have to believe in independence to support the SNP”.

Ten days ago she told another BBC debate: “A vote for the SNP is not a mandate for independence”.

Her words, her choice.

By her logic, the victory is affirmation of the SNP as a party of government, not a mandate for Indyref2. It has always seemed an odd thing to say, for a referendum party.

Sturgeon said it would be “democratically unsustainable” to resist an SNP majority. She said this in 2017 when explaining the “triple lock” – a spin doctor’s wheeze that has since evolved into the “settled will”. The triple lock referred to a majority at Holyrood, a majority of Scottish seats at Westminster and a Holyrood vote in favour of Indyref2.

Since then the SNP have dominated elections, passed a referendum act in 2019 and now plan to pass another. During this time, democracy and the union has sustained.

Change of game required

“Settled will” was last banded around in the mid 1990s to describe the desire for devolution.

In 1997, pro-devolution parties won 80% of the vote. The pro-independence share this year (the Greens and the SNP) is just under 50% in both constituency and list votes.

The SNP have been using the same electoral tactics, the same rhetoric and the same gestures since 2016. So far, no referendum.

Which means the onus is on the Scottish Government to change the game. However, they have boxed themselves in on tactical options.

Support for change would have to be running at around 70% for the bitter pill of bad economic news to be swallowed

Under Sturgeon’s leadership, the SNP plan an honest assessment of the risks and rewards of independence. In short, they will admit there are going to be cuts. That requires Scotland to genuinely have a settled will to leave the UK, so that voters will accept the downside.

Support for change would have to be running at around 70% for the bitter pill of bad economic news to be swallowed without making Scots sick. It would require the entire Labour vote becoming pro-independence, which is unlikely.

Nicola Sturgeon on the steps outside Bute House

The alternative is to change the big ask of Indyref2 into pragmatic requests for more powers. Identify something all Scots would see as reasonable, and press for that. It might win over those Labour voters.

Sturgeon won’t do that, as she is fixed on the old “independence, nothing less” mantra.

For all the public indignation from the pro-independence camp of the last few days, privately they know they are in a spot.

A question of passion

The longer they wait, the greater the impression that the leadership team simply can’t resolve independence-related problems.

Fixing matters of currency, coping with a share of the UK’s huge national debt and honouring promises on fairness when budgets are cut are not easy matters to answer.

We have been cash bombed for decades, and arguably suffered from more money than sense

This will feed into the idea that Sturgeon is not simply happy to wait till 2023, but finds her passion for independence waning altogether. She would deny that outright, but it’s an impression gaining ground in London.

Holyrood voice, Westminster money

For the Indy faithful, this is clearly a problem, but for Scots in general, the SNP might have achieved the perfect result. A strong Scottish voice in Edinburgh with a bumper spending packet from Westminster.

More money is always nice, but it won’t fix those issues about public services, or declining standards. We have been cash bombed for decades, and arguably suffered from more money than sense.

If Sturgeon and the SNP care for Scotland, they need to come up with something that breaks the impasse. We await surprises.


Read more by Alex Bell: