Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Frank Gilfeather: Have SPFL teams considered playing better football to tempt fans back?

Aberdeen FC are one of five Scottish football teams who commissioned a review of the SPFL (Photo: Newsline Media Limited)
Aberdeen FC are one of five Scottish football teams who commissioned a review of the SPFL (Photo: Newsline Media Limited)

I have no idea what the five Scottish Premiership football clubs are paying Deloitte – accountants don’t come cheap – for a review of the Scottish Professional Football Leagues, but history tells us the report might gather dust on a shelf.

Aberdeen, the two Dundee clubs and Edinburgh rivals Hearts and Hibs have commissioned the study as they seek a “strategic and holistic” review of the SPFL or, in layman’s terms, how to make money from a flagging national sport.

So, what will those nice folk at Deloitte discover as they focus on commercial growth, the SPFL brand and its structure and governance – good luck with that – and the competition out there for paying customers?

Results bring in cash

If those carrying out the review haven’t been on Mars for the last three decades, they’ll know that, outside Celtic and Rangers, no Scottish club expects to win the league championship. They’ll also recognise the big two are the big two because they have better – well, more expensive – players than the others and have stadia that can accommodate up to 60,000 fans.

As three of the owners of the five outfits seeking Deloitte’s assistance are American and a fourth, Dons chairman Dave Cormack, has lived in the States for years, they just have to “do the math” to find an answer to the “how do we bring in more people and, therefore, cash?” question. Results, guys.

Rangers and Celtic are known as the ‘big two’ for a reason (Photo: Shutterstock)

There is also the issue of facilities at football grounds, many of which haven’t had so much as a lick of paint since Paddy Buckley was a boy.

Then, there’s our winters. I’ve seen kids beg: “When can we go home?” during cold, wet, dull games. In fact, I’m sure some adults have whimpered something similar in such circumstances.

Souness and Advocaat started a culture of debt

Reinvestment wasn’t a word football clubs understood during the halcyon days of Scottish football, long before the playing field became uneven. That was before managers like Graeme Souness and Dick Advocaat arrived at Rangers and persuaded their board of directors to part with huge sums in order to be the best in Scotland.

Cue debt and borrowing and financial difficulties accompanied by an inability or an unwillingness by rivals to try and keep up.

So, don’t be surprise if Deloitte come back in six months and tell the five clubs: “Start winning things and the fans might come back.”


Read more by Frank Gilfeather: