Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tim Eggar: Pitting net zero aims and energy security against each other is a dangerous mistake

The oil and gas industry is already adapting to be more sustainable (Photo: AzmanMD/Shutterstock)
The oil and gas industry is already adapting to be more sustainable (Photo: AzmanMD/Shutterstock)

An autumnal chill is here, bringing thoughts of a cold winter which, this year, carries a sense of dread for households facing soaring energy bills.

The energy price freeze is welcome, but uncertainty surrounds the coming dark months. Even if Britain can produce and import enough gas and electricity to keep the lights on, will we be able to afford it?

Energy security has long been taken for granted. Now the word “blackout” is prevalent for the first time in decades. Troublingly, Ofgem has warned that the UK faces a risk of shortages due to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

This anxiety may be unwarranted. The government says our energy mix is diverse, and National Grid predicts power cuts are unlikely. Fortunately, we are not reliant on Russia, like our European counterparts. Most of our gas comes from the North Sea and Norway, and ministers are working to lock in additional, long-term supplies.

Nonetheless, the realisation that our energy security is not where it needs to be has started a blame game, and the net zero carbon emissions aim has taken plenty of criticism.

It isn’t a case of either/or

Net zero is not to blame, and is not at odds with security of supply. Much of the planned investment in UK renewable energy projects comes from North Sea oil and gas companies. It isn’t a case of either/or, and placing net zero and energy security in opposition is a dangerous mistake.

We need to transition rapidly, but that doesn’t mean the UK should wind down oil and gas production prematurely. The industry has committed to halving emissions by 2030, while continuing to meet a huge proportion of our energy needs.

The oil and gas industry has committed to halving emissions by 2030. Photo: Opsorman/Shutterstock

The carbon footprint of UK-produced gas is less than half that of imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). Allowing domestic production to tail off when oil and gas meet three-quarters of UK energy demand would pass more responsibility for tackling climate change to other regions, which we cannot hold to account.

The North Sea is our trump card. It gives us unique advantages, with its rich energy resources, carbon storage capacity and infrastructure ready to be repurposed.

North Sea emissions have reduced by more than 20%

The UK Government’s 2021 North Sea Transition Deal with the oil and gas industry shows how to take advantage of opportunities, including a pledge to ensure that at least half of spending on energy transition projects goes to UK suppliers. It also acknowledges the role gas will play as a bridge to a low-carbon future, giving the sector much-needed political stability.

Lit gas ring.
Gas will be a bridge to a low-carbon future. Photo: Yui Mok/PA

This approach is paying off, with North Sea emissions reduced by more than 20% between 2018 and 2021. Eliminating wasteful offshore flaring by investing in new equipment is a priority. Reductions in 2021 were enough to meet the gas demand of 130,000 homes – equivalent to a city the size of Aberdeen – for a year, a prime example of security of supply and net zero going hand in hand.

North Sea industry will go further on emissions. Electrification – upgrading offshore platforms to run on clean electricity – is essential to meet targets, and two projects should be commissioned by 2027. In addition, the UK’s first carbon storage (CCS) round has attracted bids from 19 companies.

We need balanced offshore energy policy

The North Sea Transition Authority is working with industry to bring new oil and gas projects online. These supplies will reinforce efforts to achieve growth by helping to keep businesses open while creating employment for the supply chain.

We have just launched an oil and gas licensing round, expected to result in more than 100 licence awards. Priority areas with known gas reserves will be fast-tracked to boost supply quickly. Industry can deliver.

The North Sea has underpinned our living standards for 50 years. It will continue to do so

The North Sea has underpinned our living standards for 50 years. It will continue to do so. To reach net zero by 2050, we need a balanced offshore energy policy which encourages offshore wind, CCS and hydrogen, and maximises the role of an oil and gas industry committed to cleaner operations.

Let’s embrace the way forward to an emissions-free, energy-secure world – a daunting challenge, but achievable if we come together with open minds.


Tim Eggar is chairman of the North Sea Transition Authority, which regulates the UK oil, gas and carbon storage industries

Conversation