Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Catherine Deveney: When it comes to Phillip Schofield, enough is enough

'Here’s the bottom line: if Schofield has done anything to merit this onslaught, he should be tried in a court of law, not judged and humiliated in some kangaroo court of public opinion.'

Phillip Schofield has undergone immense public scrutiny since he admitted having an affair with a younger male colleague.
Philip Schofield.

When confronted by wildlife videos in which some hapless animal – perhaps powerful in its own kingdom – gets surrounded by predators, I look away before the kill.

A useful picture to keep in mind when considering the Phillip Schofield affair. Not only has the relentlessness been unedifying, but we reached the pinnacle of ridiculousness when his “consensual and legal” affair topped ITV’s news agenda, becoming literally the lead item after the 10 o’clock boings.

While Boris Johnson dodged public accountability over his WhatsApp messages, the media reckoned Schofield deserved more scrutiny than a rogue ex-Prime Minister.

What’s going on?

There are issues to address that are now bigger than Schofield himself. Firstly, there’s a shocking disparity between our words about mental health and our actions.

Our national mental health strategy gives parity to mental and physical health, with large sums of public money being spent on mental health awareness.

We now – largely – talk a good game. Yet, we still do not translate that abstract policy to concrete situations.

What has happened to Phillip Schofield is not public accountability. It’s public annihilation.

Watching his mental distress feels uncomfortably like the adult equivalent of  a playground fight, the pack gathering in glee shouting, “Fight, fight, fight!” Except children are more honest in their prurience, while adults have a misplaced self-righteousness.

Here’s the bottom line: if Schofield has done anything to merit this onslaught, he should be tried in a court of law, not judged and humiliated in some kangaroo court of public opinion.

Then there’s our confused attitude to power. As a journalist, the issue I have written most about over the years is abuse, particularly in religious settings.

It fires me up because I have witnessed personally the broken adults that abused children so often grow into.

They are fruits that wither on the vine. Their lives are blighted by physical, social, psychological and sexual difficulties and those dealing with victims will, at some point, receive tragic messages about premature deaths and suicides.

It does not help to bandy the word abuse about without certainty it applies

So, I care about abuse. I care passionately about it. But it does not help to bandy the words ‘abuse’ and ‘grooming’ about without certainty that they apply.

Schofield described his relationship with a 20-year-old male runner as “unwise”. I can only agree. Why would someone approaching 60 want a relationship with a 20-year-old?

What on earth would you talk about? Your botox treatment? But if it’s consensual, that’s their business, and anyway, if 20-year-olds are so vulnerable, why are we letting 16-year-olds marry?

The worst accusation seems to be that Schofield’s relationship was an abuse of power by an older TV presenter towards a starry-eyed newcomer. Is that true? Maybe.

But it’s important to recognise that many things make you vulnerable at different stages of life.

Age is only one factor and an older adult is not necessarily less vulnerable than a younger one.

There also seems to be more than a whiff of homophobia here.

I await with interest, for instance, soul-searching interviews with 79-year-old acting legend, Robert de Niro, who has just had a baby with a much younger woman he met on a film set, or 83-year-old Al Pacino who has just had a baby with 29-year-old film producer, Noor Alfallah, an ex-squeeze of Mick Jagger. (Where does Noor look for her partners? The lonely hearts column of Saga magazine?)

The thing that always infuriates me when writing about abuse is the icy response of powerful organisations which protect themselves rather than their victims.

ITV has been criticised in the past for failures to protect stars

ITV has been criticised in the past for failures to protect both insiders like Caroline Flack, and reality TV contestants.

This week, executives faced a parliamentary committee about safeguarding. How much of their attitude to Schofield was driven by that forthcoming appearance, rather than the welfare of those at the heart of this story?

Schofield’s biggest crime appears to be lying. Unseemly and unpleasant for sure, but a distinction should be made here.

His lie did not conceal a crime. Nor did it advance his situation or feather his nest. It was about privacy and protection. The people who have the most cause to be angry and hurt about that lie – his wife and family – have stood by him.  His “friends”, less so.

Who knew that Apple TV’s series, “The Morning Show”, was quite so accurate?

Phillip Schofield, Holly Willoughby, Ruth Langsford and Eamonn Holmes, as Eamonn has said Holly Willoughby should follow Phillip Schofield “out the door” of This Morning. Image: PA

The Schofield affair played out that fictional narrative almost to the letter. Ambition, power, jealousy, schadenfreude…it’s all been there.

I have no idea if Schofield is as toxic as some claim, but Eamon Holmes sank his gargantuan boots in, claiming to be speaking, “for those without a voice”.

He illustrated perfectly how to make yourself look more viciously unpleasant than the person being criticised.

If you can’t speak when it’s difficult to do so, don’t become brave because the crowd is at your back. More to come? I think we have already seen more of Phillip Schofield’s entrails than necessary. Enough now, surely.


Catherine Deveney is an award-winning investigative journalist, novelist, television presenter and Scottish Newspaper Columnist of the Year 2022.

Conversation