Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Ryan Crighton: Labour heading in right direction on energy – but a diversion is required

The path to net zero has more than 66,000 possible routes.

Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer (left) and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar on a recent Scotland visit. Image: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire
Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer (left) and Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar on a recent Scotland visit. Image: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

I recently discovered that Aberdeen’s taxi drivers have to learn up to 66,000 possible routes through the city before they can pick up their first passenger.

The city’s street knowledge test – which is mandatory for our cabbies – is the toughest anywhere in Great Britain.

The staggering challenge these drivers overcome is surpassed only by the hill start facing an industry upon which their livelihoods depend: our energy sector.

The many thousand routes through Aberdeen pale into insignificance when you consider how complex our road to net zero will be.

To get there, we need to preserve energy security, rewire our entire energy system, and create tens of thousands of new jobs to replace existing ones. And to achieve all this, we need to unlock almost unfathomable amounts of capital.

This is why the transition has rightly been billed as the biggest engineering challenge this country has ever faced. The party which wins the upcoming general election, most likely Labour, will have to tackle these problems head on.

My concern about Labour’s plans for the North Sea are well-documented, and I subscribe to the expert view that its proposals could jeopardise jobs. Nevertheless, there is still much to like about Labour’s direction of travel.

If things go his way on July 4, Sir Keir Starmer will head up a mission-led government which wants to cut bills and create good jobs for the future through Great British Energy, headquartered right here in Scotland.

And Starmer sees the problems: a sluggish planning system unable to keep pace with the vast projects which need unlocked, and a grid unable to cope with the scale of industrial development taking place along our shores.

So, a Labour win could be good for the North Sea, good for Aberdeen, and good for the energy transition – but the party needs to play the hand it is given.

Its policies have been drawn up on the assumption that North Sea oil and gas companies are raking in record profits, and that there are jobs aplenty in renewables. In reality, neither is the case.

Labour will inherit a fiscal regime which has reduced profits at the North Sea’s biggest operator – Harbour Energy – to a point where Tesco makes more money every eight days than Harbour does in a year. Another tax will be a tax too far, of that I am sure.

At the same time, both the current UK and Scottish Governments have failed to accelerate job creation in the renewables sector, where employment has only risen from 23,200 to 25,700 over the past nine years.

There is also the uncomfortable truth that both governments have made little progress with cutting our reliance on fossil fuels – evidenced by the fact that 24 million UK homes continue to be powered by gas alone.

For these reasons, the UK is not ready to accelerate away from oil and gas at this moment in time. If anything, that would make the transition harder. So, Labour must make the North Sea a viable and attractive investment if it is to protect jobs and revenue.

Labour should share risk in order to share rewards

There is a way through this, and Labour is right to look at the Norwegian model – but we cannot simply copy the high tax regime there without mirroring the allowances which make it work.

And for as long as North Sea gas is demonstrably cleaner than importing gas from abroad, we should not rule out exploring for more.

Workers with an offshore oil rig in the distance
A successful transition to renewable energy involves government collaborating with oil and gas workers. Image: m. afiqsyahmi/Shutterstock

Labour’s intention to recycle oil and gas profits into renewables is one which the public and industry can align behind. So, how do we achieve it?

Instead of levying a windfall tax on these companies, a Labour government should consider ways to share some of the risk, and therefore some of the rewards, from the oil and gas left in the UK. That should extend to taking a stake in new projects.

By doing so, the money raised could capitalise Great British Energy in a way that taxing the oil and gas sector to death would never achieve.

When it comes to selecting a headquarters for Great British Energy, let’s make sure that all roads lead to Aberdeen

The path to net zero has more than 66,000 possible routes, but the path of least resistance for Labour will be the one which takes industry and workers along.

And, when it comes to selecting a headquarters for Great British Energy, let’s make sure that all roads lead to Aberdeen – a city which has powered the UK economy for 50 years, and is ready to do so for 50 years more.


Ryan Crighton is policy director at Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce

Conversation