Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Prof Sarah Pedersen: If trolls get their way, we could end up with no female politicians

Sarah Pedersen
Sarah Pedersen

Social media offers us the possibility of direct communication with politicians.

That can be good – grassroots opinion can make itself heard, politicians can be called to account, opinions can be exchanged.

However, it can be bad.

Social media such as Twitter and Facebook also enables aggressive messages, abuse and threats of violence to be sent directly to an MP, MSP or local councillor.

When researching the use of social media during political campaigns I have often been shocked at the abuse that politicians receive online. Insults and derogatory comments can be sent directly to a politician through the use of their Twitter handle or as a comment on a Facebook post.

What particularly amazes me is that much of this abuse is sent from personal social media accounts, making the abuser very easy to identify. Threats are sent by people using accounts that give their name, address and details of their family, friends and employer.

Why do some people feel that social media gives them a licence to abuse a politician in a way they would not do if they met them on the street?

Social media gives us a false sense of anonymity – and it is false, as the rising number of arrests for such behaviour attests.

Research suggests that women politicians are particularly the focus of such abuse.

And that the abuse aimed at women politicians often includes threats of violence, and in particular sexual violence. One academic, Dr Emma Jane of New South Wales University in Australia, calls it ‘e-bile’, which she argues is increasingly achieving its aim of silencing women in public discourse.

Women are put off political careers – or indeed any form of public life – for fear of the online and real-life abuse and the threat of physical danger they might encounter.

In January a BBC radio 5 live survey found that an overwhelming majority of women MPs have received online and verbal abuse from the public – some reported death and rape threats.

A report from the European Parliament in October based on a survey of over 900 female parliamentarians agreed that social media can be a ugly place for women in politics.

The Labour MP Jess Phillips has spoken of the night she received more than 600 threats of rape on Twitter.

She has had to install heightened security measures in her home, where she lives with her young children.

In a study undertaken by researchers at RGU during the general election campaign in 2015 we found that women politicians such as Ruth Davidson and Nicola Sturgeon were far more likely to be the targets of crude, sexually violent aggression online than male politicians.

Some women politicians attempt to ‘rise above’ the abuse, but more and more are speaking out.

In 2014 a Twitter troll who sent the MP Stella Creasy messages calling her a witch and threatening her with rape was jailed. Creasy has called on web companies to use their resources to tackle the issue, which she feels is still not taken seriously by technology companies or the police.

In March this year the police announced an investigation into the online abuse, including death threats, threats of violence and sexualised insults, sent to Nicola Sturgeon.

Such police action is good – but it is much more important that as a society we take a stand against abuse of all politicians, whatever their gender. Political debate is necessary, but these trolls are not looking for debate. They are looking to spill their e-bile out on to men and women in the public eye.

In Scotland we celebrate the diversity of our political leaders. However, if we do not act soon to deal with the problem of abuse of women in public life, we may find that women start to think twice about whether they want to stand for election.