Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Catherine Deveney: I’d love to take a wee holiday from being a feminist – but there is always too much still to say

Journalist Carrie Gracie (centre) and BBC employees gather outside Broadcasting House in London, to highlight equal pay on International Women's Day. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Thursday March 8, 2018. See PA story MEDIA Women. Photo credit should read: John Stillwell/PA Wire
Journalist Carrie Gracie (centre) and BBC employees gather outside Broadcasting House in London, to highlight equal pay on International Women's Day. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Thursday March 8, 2018. See PA story MEDIA Women. Photo credit should read: John Stillwell/PA Wire

Next week, around 400 people will gather in Piccadilly for the midnight launch of The Testaments, Margaret Atwood’s Booker nominated sequel to her dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale.

A midnight launch is more associated with titles like Harry Potter in which bad magic abounds, but Potter is a jolly kind of horror compared to Atwood’s chilling story of a world where women are enslaved for breeding and denied personal rights, including bank accounts. A tale that exaggerates a familiar reality is more horrifying than one which creates an alternative fantasy world.

Catherine Deveney.

Every so often, I think I’d like a wee holiday from being a feminist. Learn to, you know, just smile and let it all go. Pointing out the power imbalance to the powerful (usually men) guarantees tortuous conversations that drop into an icy vortex of glacial eye contact and rigid smiles, and leave a bitter taste in the mouth, like you have been drinking malt vinegar. It’s exhausting. But after reading that some attending the launch would be dressing up in cloaks and bonnets, like the handmaids in the powerful TV adaptation of Atwood’s novel, I’ll delay that vacation a little longer to point out just how apt the handmaid metaphor still is.

Handmaids are female servants, useful but subservient. The recent G7 illustrated one of our contemporary equivalents: the wives of presidents and prime ministers paraded to the world in a picture from which Angela Merkel’s other half was noticeably absent. The women are there as the handmaids of the lords. Being a handmaid does not suit the male’s temperament or ego. Or his diary.

The fact that the handmaids are a status symbol became evident in a spat between French President, Emmanuel Macron, and the Brazilian President, Jair Messias Bolsonarro, over the Amazon fires. A picture of Macron’s wife Brigitte was posted on social media alongside Bolsonaro’s much younger wife, Michelle, Little wonder, the comment said,  that Macron had it in for Bolsonaro. From a woman, the comment would have been filed under ‘bitchy’ but since it was a man, we have to read it as valid social comment.

Certainly, Bolsonaro thought so. With an illustration of the incisive brain that clearly got him elected, he posted, “Ha, ha, don’t humiliate the guy.” Cue song: don’t you wish your handmaid was hot like mine?

Interesting that in the month “The Testaments” is published, so is “Equal” the account from the BBC’s former China editor, Carrie Gracie, of her battle with the corporation over equal pay. It was a battle that left her exhausted and depressed. Originally, Gracie was reluctant to take the post. She had battled breast cancer, nursed a child through leukaemia, and didn’t want the family disruption. But she was also a fluent Mandarin speaker. The BBC needed her.

She agreed as long as she was paid equally. Only when the BBC were forced to publish a list of those earning over 150, 000 did Gracie realise she had been shafted. She wasn’t on it. But her male equivalent in America was. And her male equivalent in the Middle East. Her male equivalent everywhere else in the world, in fact. It wasn’t that Gracie wasn’t needed as much as they were. Nobody else could speak Mandarin.

Gracie’s account is sad and salutary because she did what many women do: imagined a reciprocal sense of loyalty between her and her employer. Men, as a rule, are more savvy. They don’t create false intimacy with employers, or suffer guilt pangs when they say “no”. (Nor are they deemed “difficult” when they do). Gracie thought the BBC were “good” employers. She wanted to be a “good” employee back. In those circumstances, betrayal is more deeply personal – and humiliating. But to her credit, Gracie didn’t relent. She wasn’t willing to be a handmaid any more.

Money is a highly effective control. In “The Handmaid’s Tale”, women are cut off from banks and income sources.  I once interviewed Margaret Atwood and one of my favourite memories of our meeting was when she asked if I had a daughter. I did. Well, she had some advice for me. I should always ensure that my daughter had money in her shoe for an emergency taxi. Money is power: it turns a handmaid into the employer of a driver.

Atwood was formidable, shrewd, a tiny, fine-boned figure with a pale delicacy and a halo of wild grey curls. She didn’t hate men, or court a feminist tag, but she wasn’t frightened of it either. “Put it this way,” she told me drily. “Some girls in my school wore fluffy pink angora sweaters. I wasn’t one of them.”

Creative people, she insisted, were the most entrepreneurial group of all. They didn’t take a heap of steel and make it into a nail. They took nothing and made it into something. True – but Atwood’s handmaids are based on a something that despite being exaggerated, had a recognisable kernel of truth. Sadly, over thirty years later, and almost fifty years after the passing of the 1970 equal pay act, they still do.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Catherine Deveney is an award-winning investigative journalist, novelist and television presenter