Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Lindsay Razaq: Let sleeping monsters lie – why I for one never want to know the ‘truth’ about Nessie

Professor Neil Gemmell of New Zealand’s University of Otago has said the most plausible explanation for the potential sightings is a giant eel
Professor Neil Gemmell of New Zealand’s University of Otago has said the most plausible explanation for the potential sightings is a giant eel

“Nessie ‘relative’ spotted in Kenya”, read the headline.

It was sitting above an article about a Scottish scientist who had discovered a creature in a volcanic lake that he believed could belong to a species similar to the Loch Ness Monster.

“The creature’s ancestors could have been living undisturbed in a vent beneath the lake for several million years,” it claimed. “The conditions are near perfect.”

Lindsay Razaq.

The date? April 1, 1998…

I love a silly April Fool’s hoax. There have been some absolute gems in the past, including the report on Radio 4’s Today programme in 2004 about plans for an Archers theme tune remix and the Swiss Spaghetti harvest, shown on Panorama in 1957.

But Nessie’s long-lost East African cousin remains my favourite.

So much so, I’ve still got a photocopy of the page from the Kenyan newspaper in which it featured – hence my ability to quote it all this time later. I think I remember it so well, firstly because it seemed entirely plausible, although I was only 13, and probably easily duped. But also because it underlined the international reach of the legend of the Loch Ness Monster, which fascinated me from a young age.

It does to this day. Therefore, I guess it will come as no surprise that my daughter Maya’s teddy collection includes a bright-green Nessie, clad in a kilt and tartan tammy.

Clearly, I’m not alone in being drawn in by this captivating tale, which can be traced back to 565 AD when Irish missionary St Columba reportedly saved a man from being attacked by a beast in the loch. And in the decades since the first modern sighting in the 1930s, there have been multiple efforts to prove her existence, including a BBC-funded venture in 2003 which used 600 sonar beams.

The latest team of scientists to study the loch, which is the largest body of water by volume in the UK, unveiled their findings this week, concluding that the monster might be a giant eel.

The group from a New Zealand university, who used DNA sampling techniques to catalogue what lives beneath the surface, found the presence of around 3,000 species.

No evidence of any reptilian sequences was uncovered, throwing a wet blanket on the idea that plesiosaurs, which could grow up to 15 metres long, might have survived the dinosaur extinction. The study leader said he was surprised by the volume of eel DNA, however, adding he couldn’t rule out the possibility that eels present had grown to an extreme size.

There was a great big, tongue-in-cheek caveat though – the team didn’t know if the eel DNA detected was from one gigantic eel or lots of small ones.

I’ll confess that when the scientists announced to top billing last month that they had identified a credible theory for sightings of the Loch Ness Monster, I was pretty excited, eager to find out what the biological explanation would be.

Maybe the mystery was about to be solved?

I was, as a result, a tad disappointed. This was certainly my fault for setting my expectations too high, however, and the team deserves huge credit for skilfully securing such extensive publicity for their work, in turn raising the profile of environmental DNA research.

For them, it was and is – quite rightly – all about the science, rather than folklore. It should be noted too that the project will eventually provide a publicly available database of all the species in the loch, which could help monitor changes in biodiversity.

At any rate, if it came to it, I’m not sure I’d really want to know the truth about Nessie. I’m not convinced I’m ready to hear it.

It is best, perhaps, to let sleeping monsters lie.

The Loch Ness Monster is fascinating precisely because we don’t know.

On one level, it seems a shame to debunk a story that has enthralled us for many years – not to mention bolstered the Scottish tourism industry. Thus, in that spirit, I will keep on believing. And even if Nessie was proven not to exist beyond a shadow of a doubt, you still wouldn’t catch me swimming in Loch Ness, which is no mean thing as for me, outdoor swimming is one of life’s unrivalled pleasures.

Okay, I wouldn’t go in because it’s not recommended due to the bitterly cold water – just 5C – all year round. But I wouldn’t be able to keep the thought of Nessie nibbling on my toe – or a gigantic eel for that matter – out of my head either.

All of this said, I fully understand the drive to get to the bottom of the legend, to rationalise it. It’s the job of scientists – and humans more widely – to look critically at the environment around us and to ask questions.

Moreover, scientific endeavour has undeniably brought about so much good throughout history, although admittedly evil too.

It has been used to brilliant, life-saving ends.

But in a world where much has been explained, where we’ve deciphered so many of nature’s secrets, surely there’s no harm in a little bit of enigma.

Surely there’s room for Nessie.


Lindsay Razaq is a journalist and former P&J Westminster political correspondent who now combines freelance writing with being a first-time mum