Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Campbell Gunn: As Winston Churchill had it, even flawed democracy is still the best of a bad bunch

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/Shutterstock (10996543ai)
Detroit Will Breathe supporter Betsy Camaredo of Hazel Park holds a sign that says "Count Every Vote" outside of the Detroit Department of Elections Central Counting Board of Voting absentee ballot counting center at TCF Center, Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2020 in Detroit, MI. With the surge in vote by mail/absentee ballots, analysts cautioned it could take days to count all the ballots, leading some states to initially look like victories for President Trump only to later shift towards democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden. (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times)
Ballot Counting in Michigan US Election, Tcf Center, Detroit, Mi, United States - 04 Nov 2020
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/Shutterstock (10996543ai) Detroit Will Breathe supporter Betsy Camaredo of Hazel Park holds a sign that says "Count Every Vote" outside of the Detroit Department of Elections Central Counting Board of Voting absentee ballot counting center at TCF Center, Wednesday, Nov. 4, 2020 in Detroit, MI. With the surge in vote by mail/absentee ballots, analysts cautioned it could take days to count all the ballots, leading some states to initially look like victories for President Trump only to later shift towards democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden. (Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times) Ballot Counting in Michigan US Election, Tcf Center, Detroit, Mi, United States - 04 Nov 2020

LAST week, Donald Trump finally bowed to the inevitability of the fact that Joe Biden had beaten him in the race to the United States presidency. He did it with little good grace, and with continued mutterings of vote-rigging and cheating. Basically, he was trashing the democratic system on which the United States was founded.

One benefit of all the rows and controversy over the Trump-Biden contest is that we all now know far more about the American electoral system than we ever did. Their electoral college system, drawn up by the United States’ founding fathers, gives each of the states a number of delegate votes dependent on their population. Thus, states such as California or Texas have far more electoral delegates than, say, Alaska or Montana. Traditionally, though not by statute, the victor in each state has all of that state’s delegate votes.

Campbell Gunn.

This system, of course, can create anomalies, for example even if a candidate wins by 51 per cent to his opponent’s 49, he (as both candidates this time were men) receives all that state’s votes, thus effectively disenfranchising those in the minority. That means that a candidate can win the popular vote across the United States, and still lose the election, as happened with Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000.

There have been numerous unsuccessful attempts over the years to change the US system, despite polls demonstrating support among ordinary Americans for reform. Put simply, the system is flawed and could be improved.

Many different systems

But on this side of the Atlantic, do we have any justification for criticising our American cousins? Absolutely not. In Scotland, we have three regular elections under three different electoral systems – councils, Holyrood and Westminster – and none of them is perfect. Up to last year when the UK decided to leave the EU we even had a fourth set of elections, under a fourth electoral system.

Scottish council elections are held under the single transferrable vote system, where candidates are ranked in order of preference, with each ward electing three or four councillors. This replaced the previous first-past-the-post system, which allowed a party with less than half the votes to win an overwhelming majority of seats, as was the case for the Labour Party in Glasgow for many years. The result is that most Scottish councils now have no single party in overall control. It does give a more accurate reflection of the public vote but breaks the tie between an individual councillor and a local area.

Holyrood and Westminster

The Scottish Parliament uses a hybrid system combining constituency elected MSPs with “top-up” lists using the d’Hondt voting system, which is too complex to explain here, but is designed to create a roughly equivalent percent of elected members for each party for the number of votes they received. It works, roughly, but creates two classes of MSP, with constituency members able to point to the fact that they were elected on individual merit by electors, while their “top-up” colleagues were simply party place men or women. Parliamentary and party officials can state as often as they like that there’s technically no difference between the two types of MSPs, but the MSPs themselves know differently.

Then there’s Westminster. Of all the electoral systems, surely the first-past-the-post is the worst. In its defence, its supporters will point out that it produces – most of the time – majority government. But that majority is almost always elected by a minority of the electorate. Indeed, its most glaring deficiency can be seen in Scotland. For years in the latter half of the 20th century, Labour, with less than half the votes in Scotland, elected an overwhelming majority of Scotland’s MPs. And more recently, it has worked in the Scottish National Party’s favour. In 2015, the SNP took 50 per cent of the vote, yet won 56 out of the 59 Scottish seats – hardly proportional.

In the last European elections, held just last year you may remember, a variant of the d’Hondt system was used. Turnout was less than 40 per cent in Scotland, and with just 38 per cent of that figure, the SNP took three of the six available seats. In other words, they won half the seats with 15 per cent of the electorate.

The conclusion is an admission that none of the various democratic systems works perfectly, despite its two and a half thousand-year history reaching back to the Athenians. However, let Winston Churchill have the last word. While claiming that the best argument against democracy was a five-minute conversation with the average voter, he also admitted, “Democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others”. On that we can surely all agree.


Campbell Gunn is a retired political editor who served as special adviser to two First Ministers of Scotland