Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Catherine Deveney: Boris Johnson only offers help when there’s something in it for him

Jennifer Arcuri appears on Good Morning Britain, flanked by past images of her with Boris Johnson (Photo: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)

Listen, I’m as much of a sucker for a love story as anyone else.

But hearing toe-curling details from American businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri’s diaries, describing her trysts with Boris Johnson, is a bit like watching archive footage of Benny Hill licking his lips over well-endowed, blonde bombshells in nurses outfits.

How can I be “the throttle” to your career, Jennifer? Nudge, nudge. Worse: “I can barely control myself whenever I see you. You make me too excited. Baby, I couldn’t wait.” Oh yikk, prime minister.

In the inventory of Boris Johnsons’ credentials for being premier, the plus list is sparse. Maybe just his rhinoceros-thick skin that can absorb superhuman levels of public humiliation with barely a blush. In the minus section – which contains incompetence, laziness, and a final-warning referral to the personal grooming police – we can now add “spectacularly bad judge of character”.

Arcuri gave her diary, which contained “verbatim notes” of their pillow talk to a documentary maker. Who does that? “Boris, honey, slow down… what did you say after ‘baby’?”

Voters are finally realising the truth

As is often the case, it was a news story running alongside the Johnson-Arcuri shenanigans that brought it into sharp relief. A desperate man on a 21-day hunger strike, dressed in a padded jacket and woollen hat against the November cold, dishevelled from living in a makeshift tent, is pictured outside the Foreign Office.

Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of Iranian detainee Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, outside the Foreign Office during his hunger strike (Photo: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire)

Richard Ratcliffe’s vigil for his wife Nazanin, who has been imprisoned in Tehran for five years on bogus spying charges, is the love song to Johnson’s bawdy ballad. His unfaltering fight for his wife illustrates the tenacity and loyalty that epitomise the best of human love. His words, juxtaposed beside Johnson’s, contrast a man of integrity with an opportunistic Lothario. Shame they can’t swap jobs.

You should never mix up the job descriptions for national comedian and national leader

The reaction to the latest Arcuri revelations – which have entrenched the government deeper in sleaze allegations following the Owen Paterson case – is astonishing. Labour, who were being written off as unelectable just weeks ago, are suddenly in a five-point lead, with Johnson’s personal rating plummeting to an all-time low of 21%. Why now? Has the nation suddenly awakened from a Rip Van Winkle coma?

‘Tell me how I can help you’

We knew about Jennifer Arcuri before Johnson was elected. We knew that his knowledge of the economy was most acute when considering economy of truth. The fibs, the gaffs, the stumbling, stuttering nonsense that passed for policy on the hoof… we knew it all.

But, in the national post-coma haze, it’s as if voters are now saying: “Gosh – that tree really IS a tree. Boris Johnson really IS Boris Johnson.” The laughter is beginning to dry up, and in the embarrassing silence is the realisation that you should never mix up the job descriptions for national comedian and national leader.

Images of Jennifer Arcuri with Boris Johnson (Photo: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)

Johnson was not short of words to win Arcuri’s affections. “All year I have been waiting for you. All year. You drove me nuts. I have thought about no woman as I have thought of you.” (Oh, yeah?)

Bizarrely, he offered to be the “footstool”, to her career. Arcuri would get him in trouble for helping her but he was going to anyway. Isn’t altruism lovely? “I only want to do this to make you happy. How I do wish to make you satisfied,” Arcuri reported him as saying. A fool in love? Or just a fool?

But what really sticks in the throat is Arcuri’s claim in her diary that Johnson said: “Tell me how I can help you”. For Richard Ratcliffe, how difficult that extravagant line must be to read.

People must make noise when politicians stay quiet

One would think that Johnson’s incompetence as foreign secretary, his very public mistakes in Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s case, would make him all the more determined, as prime minister, to rectify the situation. He has done nothing. And seeing his fawning words to Arcuri in print, alongside pictures of a distraught man fighting for his wife, is really difficult to stomach.

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has been detained in Iran since April 2016 (Photo: Steve Parsons/PA Wire)

It is a shame that the man who expended so much energy on an American woman he was trying to coax into his bed has so little to say on a British woman cast into an Iranian jail because of a £400 million loan that Britain has failed to repay to Iran. Integrity? Where is it?

The standards committee will decide if Boris Johnson broke formal rules. But the public must decide if he broke unwritten ones.

Richard Ratcliffe noted how few Conservative ministers stopped by to support his cause. But the public did, leaving flowers and candles and good wishes. In the deafening government silence over Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, it is up to the rest of us to make a noise.


Catherine Deveney is an award-winning investigative journalist, novelist and television presenter

Read more by Catherine Deveney: