Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Salmond inquiry: Sir Peter Housden ‘did not discuss bullying’ with Nicola Sturgeon

Former permanent secretary Sir Peter Housden.

The most senior civil servant in Alex Salmond’s government has said he did not discuss any “bullying and intimidatory” behaviour by the former first minister with Nicola Sturgeon.

Sir Peter Housden also said he did not raise harassment concerns relating to Mr Salmond with Ms Sturgeon because he was not aware of any.

Sir Peter was the Scottish Government’s permanent secretary between 2010 and 2015, a period that overlapped with Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon’s spells as first minister.

In his evidence to the Salmond inquiry last month, Sir Peter told MSPs that Mr Salmond could display “bullying and intimidatory behaviour” when he was first minister.

The former permanent secretary refused to answer repeated questions on whether he had told Ms Sturgeon – then the deputy first minister – about concerns over any ministers’ behaviour during his time in the Scottish Government.

Sir Peter also told the inquiry there was “no indication” at any stage during his time in the Scottish Government, or before, of suggestions of “sexual misconduct” involving the former first minister.

I can confirm that I was not aware of any harassment concerns and so did not discuss any with Ms Sturgeon.  While your letter refers only to ‘harassment concerns’, for the avoidance of doubt, I did not discuss any ‘bullying and intimidatory’ behaviour by Mr Salmond with Ms Sturgeon, either.”

Sir Peter Housden

When pressed on whether he had spoken to Ms Sturgeon, Sir Peter said he was “unable to go into the specifics in terms of individuals” because he had a duty of confidentiality to ministers under civil service codes.

The inquiry wrote to him last week challenging this as an “overly cautious” interpretation of the codes, and asked him to clarify if he discussed Mr Salmond’s conduct with Ms Sturgeon.

Sir Peter replied saying: “You have asked me to respond to the following question: ‘(W)hether you had raised harassment concerns that you were aware of in relation to the then First Minister, Alex Salmond, with the then Deputy First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon’.

“I can confirm that I was not aware of any harassment concerns and so did not discuss any with Ms Sturgeon. While your letter refers only to ‘harassment concerns’, for the avoidance of doubt, I did not discuss any ‘bullying and intimidatory’ behaviour by Mr Salmond with Ms Sturgeon, either.”

Sir Peter’s letter was published by the Scottish Parliament committee overseeing the Salmond inquiry, which was set up to examine the Scottish Government’s handling of complaints made against the former SNP leader.

The inquiry was established after Mr Salmond mounted a successful legal challenge against the Scottish Government in the civil courts.

The Scottish Government was forced to pay out more than £500,000 for Mr Salmond’s legal costs after a judicial review found the Scottish Government’s internal investigation into the former first minister’s behaviour was tainted with apparent bias.

In a separate criminal case, Mr Salmond was cleared of all charges against him in a sexual assault trial earlier this year.

Former First Minister Alex Salmond.

Call to publish legal advice

Sir Peter’s letter came to light as the Scottish Conservatives called on MSPs to back calls for the Scottish Government to release the legal advice it received for Mr Salmond’s civil judicial review.

Tory MSP Oliver Mundell has  submitted a motion that reads: “That the Parliament calls on the Scottish Government to publish the legal advice it received regarding the judicial review on the investigation of Alex Salmond’s alleged behaviour.”

If a majority of MSPs indicate they are willing to support the motion, the Scottish Conservatives will seek to bring forward a full parliament debate and vote calling on the government to release the legal advice.

The Scottish Government has treated this inquiry as a joke and kept key documents hidden, and the Scottish Parliament has been misled repeatedly and blatantly.”

Oliver Mundell MSP

Mr Mundell said: “When he called for a judge-led inquiry on this matter, which the Scottish Conservatives support, the SNP MSP Alex Neil said ‘this is a matter that rises above party politics’.

“We agree, so we are calling for cross-party support from MSPs across the chamber to back our motion and ask the Scottish Government to publish the legal advice they received for the Alex Salmond judicial review.

Oliver Mundell.

“The Scottish Government has treated this inquiry as a joke and kept key documents hidden, and the Scottish Parliament has been misled repeatedly and blatantly.

“We are calling on MSPs to stand up for the reputation of the parliament. The legal advice must be published, so we can find out exactly how £500,000 of public money was wasted.”

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Successive Scottish and UK governments have not disclosed the source or content of legal advice other than in the most exceptional circumstances.

“Legal privilege is inherent to the functioning of good government and the rule of law. It’s important that the legal advice which ministers and their officials receive is full and frank, and not affected by concerns about it subsequently becoming public.

“We are committed to cooperating fully with the inquiry and we are providing the relevant information requested by the committee within the confidentiality, data protection and other legal restrictions that apply.

“We have already provided the committee with more than 1,000 pages of relevant material, responding directly to the questions asked by the committee, and Scottish Government witnesses have provided more than 10 hours of oral evidence so far.

“We will continue to take appropriate steps to provide relevant information to the committee.”