Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Lib Dems propose sweeping changes to Holyrood system to rebuild public trust

Scottish Liberal Democrat Leader Willie Rennie with giant numbers at the Vennel Viewpoint of Edinburgh Castle, Edinburgh, where he announced his party's pupil premium plans while campaigning for the Scottish Parliamentary election. Picture date: Sunday March 28, 2021. PA Photo. See PA story SCOTLAND Election. Photo credit should read: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire
Scottish Liberal Democrat Leader Willie Rennie with giant numbers at the Vennel Viewpoint of Edinburgh Castle, Edinburgh, where he announced his party's pupil premium plans while campaigning for the Scottish Parliamentary election. Picture date: Sunday March 28, 2021. PA Photo. See PA story SCOTLAND Election. Photo credit should read: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire

Willie Rennie wants to evoke the ‘spirit of 99’ for the Scottish Parliament with a range of reforms aimed at building back public trust.

Four year terms, a change in the voting system, a new MSP and ministerial complaints procedure and a contempt of parliament law could all be made, the Lib Dems have said.

Mr Rennie, the party candidate for North East Fife in May’s election, believes the moves will improve the operation of Scottish politics, make it work better for people, and address “emerging problems in the balance between the elected parliament and the government”.

The Lib Dems said they would work with other parties in the next session of parliament to bring the plans forward.

The party wants to change or introduce the following:

  • A return to a four-year parliamentary term
  • A single-transferable vote
  • New rule for Contempt of Parliament
  • Use remote working experience to create a more family-friendly environment
  • Bodies given public cash to keep a ‘right to criticise’ Scottish Government
  • Strengthen Freedom of Information laws
  • More powers for Public Audit Committee
  • A major inquiry to hear the lived experiences of people during the pandemic
  • A new complaints process within the civil service

New rules to restore trust

Mr Rennie said the party was proposing changes following years of the Scottish Government “ignoring the will of parliament” and committees failing to execute their powers in the way they should.

“We want to restore trust to the public.

“The first thing we want to do is restore the four-year parliamentary cycle.

“Politicians think they can act as they can for longer, without having to go back to the people and we think we should go back to the four year cycle.

“We need to change the voting system to reflect a truer form of proportional representation, subject to less manipulation from political parties.

“We need a new rule for contempt of parliament.

“In 2018, Theresa May’s government was found in contempt for refusing to release the Brexit legal advice.

“We feel there should be the same power to do that. The Scottish Government has ignored the parliamentary vote on removing testing for five year olds and the release of the OECD report. We think they should be prevented from doing that in future.

“It shifts the balance more in favour of parliament.

“Some of the practices of remote working should be embedded, there’s no reason why committees and parliament cannot meet in hybrid form and voting can be done remotely. It would rebalance the work-life balance for some.

“There’s also a new momentum behind recall. The old excuses, because we have a list system then it is not valid, are wearing thin.

“We have had too many individual MSPs we have been unable to get rid of who have brought the parliament into disrepute.