Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

SNP put on spot over A96 dualling plans, amid row on Tories ‘stepping in’

A review is being carried out to assess the climate impact of the A96 dualling project.

The SNP’s transport minister has refused to confirm if the A96 will be dualled in full, stating a review will determine the way forward.

A row is swirling over the project after the Tories asked the UK Government to intervene if the SNP choose not to fully dual the route from Inverness to Inverurie.

It comes after an exclusive interview on The Stooshie – the DC Thomson politics podcast – in which north-east Green MSP Maggie Chapman revealed she is confident it will “not be viable” to fully dual the route for environmental reasons.

Tess White, Conservative MSP for the north-east, asked Transport Minister Graeme Dey if he agreed with Ms Chapman, to which he said she is “entitled” to her view.

He added he is “committed to the review process” which will “determine how we take this forward” but that the “current plan” is to fully dual the route.

Mr Dey said: “As part of the co-operation agreement we agreed to conduct a transparent, evidence-based review of the programme which will report by the end of 2022.”

We revealed on Monday that north-east MP Andrew Bowie had asked UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps whether he would act “to help ensure” the dualling goes ahead – despite the issue being devolved to Scotland.


The Stooshie

To listen and subscribe, free, search for ‘The Stooshie’ on Apple PodcastsSpotifyGoogle Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts!


In a response received from UK Transport Minister Trudy Harrison on Wednesday, she said “roads within Scotland are the responsibility of the Scottish Government”.

However, the minister added that the Department for Transport is “willing to collaborate, where appropriate, on matters benefitting people across the United Kingdom”.

Transport Scotland said the UK Government has “no locus in this matter” as transport policy is “devolved to Scottish ministers”.

‘Completely out of touch’

Ms White described the Scottish Government power-sharing deal as a “political road block” after Mr Dey refused to confirm whether the full dualling would go ahead or not.

She accused the Greens of being “completely out of touch with what the people of the north-east want” and claimed the SNP are “bowing down to their ridiculous demands”.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon (centre) welcomes Scottish Green co-leaders Patrick Harvie and Lorna Slater at Bute House, Charlotte Square, Edinburgh, following their government ministerial appointments.

The Conservative MSP also raised safety concerns along the route and quoted recent figures which show 195 people in the north-east have been involved in a crash in the last three years.

However, Mr Dey said that if Ms White was suggesting that safety concerns on the route would be ignored then that is “reprehensible and it is untrue”.

‘Deliberately misleading’

In response to Ms White, Ms Chapman said the Tories are “deliberately misleading people about plans for the A96” as the Greens have said they are supportive of safety improvements being carried out on the route.

Maggie Chapman MSP supports safety improvements but does not think it will be viable to dual the full route.

She added: “If Tess White had taken the time to read the co-operation deal between the Scottish Greens and the SNP she’d know that safety improvements will go ahead like the already completed bypass at Fochabers and be the absolute priority when it comes to our approach to roads, along with a climate impact assessment on every proposal.

“What we won’t do is needlessly spend billions on road expansions that increase the traffic burden and drive up climate emissions, like the reckless UK Government has pledged to do.”