Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Pro-independence group condemned for burning the Act of Union and referring to the UK as ‘Scotland’s colonial oppressor’

Salvo burned copies of the Act of Union to mark bonfire night. Picture supplied by Salvo.
Salvo burned copies of the Act of Union to mark bonfire night. Picture supplied by Salvo.

A pro-independence group has been slammed for encouraging people to burn copies of the Act of Union and for referring to the UK as Scotland’s “colonial oppressor”.

Just after midnight on November 5 a number of bonfires were lit across Scotland, including in Inverness, Nairn and Aberdeen, and people were encouraged to burn copies of the 315-year-old treaty and “all symbols of colonial oppression in Scotland”.

However the stunt, organised by a group called Salvo, has been heavily criticised and dubbed “incredibly stupid and irresponsible”.

SNP MP Pete Wishart said it is “sinister” to be burning copies of a legal act and said it is “counterproductive” to the wider independence movement.

Burn all ‘symbols of colonial oppression’

The stunt was called ‘bonfire of the vanities’ and saw nine fires lit across Scotland, including in Aberdeen, Inverness, Nairn, Kirkcaldy, Kinghorn, Glasgow and Kilmarnock.

Supporters were also encouraged to hold their own private “burnings” and link up to the one of the main events over Zoom.

One of the bonfires, picture supplied by Salvo.

The term ‘bonfire of the vanities’ comes from a series of events that took place in Florence, Italy in the 1490s when a Dominican friar encouraged his followers to burn anything considered a “luxury”, including books, manuscripts and works of art.

Sara Salyers, who attended one of these bonfires, posted on social media to say she was planning to “burn the (Treaty of) Union and all the symbols trappings of colonial oppression in Scotland”.

The Treaty of Union was signed in 1707 and officially brought England and Scotland together under one state.

This act replaced the English Parliament in Westminster and the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh with one single parliament of Great Britain.

‘Incredibly irresponsible’

The stunt has been condemned by Pete Wishart, MP for Perth and North Perthshire, who urged the group to “stop this incredible nonsense”.

Speaking to The Courier he said: “I have never seen anything like it.

“It is sinister and there is no democratic debate for burning anything like that.

“It is incredibly irresponsible.

“This was done in the name of colonial oppression and the people of Scotland don’t believe they are colonised, they would think you are mad or just laugh at that.”

Mr Wishart added acts like this hamper the wider Scottish independence movement.

He said: “We are in the business of winning people over to the cause of independence and mad and crazy stunts like that turn people off in droves.

“We are in a critical position in the debate on independence.

Pete Wishart, MP for Perth and North Perthshire. Picture by DC Thomson/Steve MacDougall.

“People are observing the language and the activity we use and when they see stuff like that they think the whole independence movement is nuts and doesn’t talk to their experience.”

He said those who want to campaign for independence should do so by knocking on people’s doors and speaking to them instead.

Group defend bonfire stunt

A spokesperson for Salvo said the plan was for the bonfires to re-enact the “burning of articles of union all over the country in 1707”.

They added they wanted to question the “legality of parliamentary sovereignty as claimed by Westminster” and said at the time “everyone turned a blind eye because it suited them”.