Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Cannon fires shots at Cricket World Cup and says all teams should have to qualify in the future

Malcolm Cannon
Malcolm Cannon

The chief executive of Cricket Scotland has responded to criticism of the current World Cup by saying that every team should have to qualify for the finals of the event in the future.

The ICC has been slated over the structure of the global competition which features just 10 teams all playing one another during a protracted schedule of 45 games.

But already, with 15 fixtures left to play, England, Australia, India and New Zealand have effectively booked their places in the semi-finals, which will not be played until July 9 and 11.

And now, Malcolm Cannon has insisted there must be radical changes after the Scots narrowly missed out on qualifying in Zimbabwe last year when they suffered from several controversial umpiring decisions and bad weather against the Windies.

Cannon told the Press and Journal: “Dead rubbers are what ruins most tournaments for neutrals. The ICC is trying to engage new fans with the sport and this does nothing to encourage new folk into the sport.

“By all means, let’s keep a 10-team World Cup if that is what is felt to be the best way to grow the game globally – although what planet anybody would live on to come up with that answer is beyond me – but let’s make all 10 teams qualify, with no hiding place, no byes, and no preferential treatment.

“One of the arguments against Associate sides [such as Scotland] taking part is the prospect of potential mismatches, but that is ludicrous, given the one-sided outcomes we have seen at this World Cup.

“Then, people say Scotland had a chance to qualify and failed. Well, that is absolutely true, but one could argue that if we had had reserve days, a DRS (decision review system) and better umpiring decisions, we would have qualified ahead of the Windies.”

The ICC has been forced on the defensive, with four matches having already fallen victim to rain and many others turning into one-sided trouncings.