Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeen chief Dave Cormack rages at Scottish Government over fan lock-out, saying football is being ‘fobbed off’

Aberdeen chairman Dave Cormack.

Aberdeen chairman Dave Cormack has accused the Scottish Government of treating football clubs “unfairly” after his bid to allow a limited number of fans back to Pittodrie was rejected.

The Dons and Saturday’s opponents Ross County were the first clubs given permission to hold a trial match in front of 300 fans in September, but – while the Staggies and other clubs in Level 1 are again being permitted to play in front of reduced number of supporters – clubs in Levels 2 and above are not.

Aberdeen had proposed allowing 1,000 fans for their home game on Saturday against Ross County followed by 2,000 against St Johnstone on Boxing Day and 4,000 against Dundee United on January 2, 2021, but their plea has been rebuffed by the government.

Cormack is frustrated at what he insists is a sound and logical argument for allowing football fans back when indoor venues have been permitted to readmit punters. He believes football clubs, despite investing significantly in setting up measures to make their grounds safe, are being “fobbed off” by the Scottish Government.

The Dons chief – who accused the Scottish Government and national clinical director Jason Leitch of doing a “U-turn” on the return of fans after encouraging clubs to spend money on safety measures – said in a statement: “It’s now very clear that Scottish football and its fans are being treated unfairly with the rejection correspondence, once again, avoiding answering the key question as to why indoor events in Level 2, with less regulation, are being favoured over the stringent, safe and highly regulated protocols we have in place at our stadium.

“We have compared the criteria in place for a range of other venues, all of which are indoors and open in Level 2, against the stringent controls at our stadium.

Aberdeen FC’s comparison of football safety measures and other venues, which have already been allowed to readmit the public.

“This stark comparison reveals that fans would be far safer in an outdoor stadium, yet we are still waiting, months later, for the Scottish Government to provide any clinical evidence to support their decision.

“Any independent observer would seriously struggle to understand why the Scottish Government continues to reject our carefully-researched and detailed application.

“Despite the devastating financial impact of the lock-out and, encouraged by (national clinical director) Jason Leitch, Scottish football clubs have invested considerable resources in robust operational planning to gradually readmit fans safely.

“At Aberdeen Football Club we’ve spent around £30,000 on putting these in place. There has been a U-turn and neither Jason Leitch nor the Scottish Government will tell us why.”

Supporters were permitted back to Pittodrie for a test event in September.

Cormack believes the Scottish Government has “ignored” the plight of clubs, as well as the wishes of fans, and insists clarity on why they cannot return in a controlled environment should be given.

He said: “Jason Leitch himself told the SPFL and Premiership clubs that outdoor activities were safer than indoor activities yet our successful, safe test events with 300 fans now seem pointless if there is no progression plan in place, even in Level 1.

“We have repeatedly asked for clarification and meetings with him and ministers, yet our requests continue to be ignored. Surely, clubs and our fans are due an explanation as to why they’ve done a U-turn.

“Over 90% of our fans surveyed want to return to Pittodrie and 80% of these fans would travel to games with limited numbers by car.

“We are committed to standing up for our fans and continue to push for their return to football to give them a bit of relief, joy and hope, many of whom live for football and who are consequently suffering from isolation, loneliness, anxiety, depression and other mental health issues.

“Yes, it costs to put on these games with limited crowds, but it’s well worth it for our fans.

“We’ve got our fans’ backs on this and we’re not going to be fobbed off easily.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We understand the importance of fans returning to stadiums but any decisions must be taken in the context of the restrictions in place to control coronavirus (Covid-19).

“Fans, in limited numbers, can attend stadiums in areas under level 1 and the best way to get fans back is to reduce the prevalence of the virus.

“As the First Minister confirmed to parliament last week, we will continue to engage with sporting bodies whose revenue is being impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic.

“We hope to bring our financial support package to fruition in the near future.”

Aberdeen chief Dave Cormack’s letter to the Scottish Government in full:

Thank you for your reply confirming that our latest applications are not being considered. Frankly, it does not answer the key question we’ve been asking for months about why the Scottish Government chooses to deny Scottish football fans access to stadia, while allowing the public into other less regulated events at Level 2, contrary to what Jason Leitch told us months ago.

We fully appreciate that public health is the Scottish Government’s top priority and that Ministers are taking a cautious approach. However, we want to be perfectly clear that our applications for allowing 1,000 fans in December, and if successful, increasing to 2,000 in late December/early January were contingent on being in either Level 1 or 2 and not Levels 3 or 4.

Let me stress that Aberdeen Football Club is simply looking for an answer to the fairness question and to work together to create a clear scenario plan for football’s return. We all know any plan allows for dates to change. Right now the “plan” is test events with 300 fans in Level 1. That’s it. Why on earth can the government not sit down and collaborate with us, at decision-maker level, on a progression plan?

The other reason we continue to push this is to give a bit of relief, joy and hope to fans, many of whom live for football and who are consequently suffering from isolation, loneliness, anxiety, depression and other mental health issues. Yes, it costs to put on these test games with limited crowds, but it’s well worth it for our fans.

We attach a table which we’ve completed with information from the current guidance on the Scottish Government’s website and had validated by Aberdeen City Council’s Environment Health Officer. This clearly shows that in Level 2, our stadium would be subject to more stringent controls than other venues, such as supermarkets, shopping centres, restaurants and cinemas – all of which are open at this time. Indeed, we would protect our fans through staggered entry and arrival times, temperature checks, strictly enforced 2 metre social distancing, one-way systems and codes of conduct, all of which would be fully stewarded. More importantly, we have a reliable test and protect capability. All of this is supported by an eminent Scottish epidemiologist.

This table patently shows that fans in stadia would be safer than in other venues which is why we are struggling to understand what is behind the decision to reject our bid and why Ministers are not considering increasing the numbers of fans permitted into stadia, even in Level 1. Based on this evidence, there are no scientific or clinical reasons why fans continue to be locked out of stadia at Level 2. The only conclusion is that football and its fans are being treated unfairly and we’d like to know why this is the case.

Clubs, like ours, who have invested considerable financial and people resources in robust operational plans and protocols and in running successful test events deserve an explanation, especially after being encouraged to make this investment by Jason Leitch who told the SPFL and Premiership Clubs that crowds, socially distanced, in stadia was far more palatable than indoor events. The purpose of running test events with 300 fans now seems pointless if there is no progression plans in place, even in Level 1. Aberdeen Football Club has so far invested around £30,000 in resources to produce its highly regulated environment for limited crowds, after being encouraged to do so by the government through Jason Leitch.

Aberdeen chief Dave Cormack has repeatedly accused national clinical director Jason Leitch of giving false encouragement to football clubs over the return of fans.
Aberdeen chief Dave Cormack has repeatedly accused national clinical director Jason Leitch of giving false encouragement to football clubs over the return of fans.

We have repeatedly asked for clarification and meetings with Jason Leitch and also Ministers, yet our requests continue to be ignored. Surely, clubs and our fans are due an explanation as to why they’ve done a U-turn?

Our fear is that any eventual funding package, although welcome, will be insufficient to stem the impending financial crisis in Scottish football if we don’t have a roadmap towards the return of fans imminently. In the meantime, we have no choice but to continue to make our case through yourself and other government officials, the media and on our own channels.

Aberdeen Football Club is committed to standing up for our fans, to making sure that their voice is heard. Over 92% of our fans want to return to Pittodrie based on our protocols. We know this because we’ve surveyed them and we’re in regular communication with them. As a result, we know the challenges they are facing. Indeed, we have just launched our Calling Home for Christmas campaign, where our dedicated calls team are making 5,000 welfare phone calls to fans who are at particular risk of social isolation and mental health problems exacerbated by the lack of football and a festive season devoid of any cheer.

This builds on the impact made earlier this year through our #StillStandingFree campaign which was set up to help fans in the wider community throughout the coronavirus crisis. Over the course of 16 weeks our dedicated staff made 15,000+ calls as part of that mass outreach programme to check-in with people during lockdown. As part of the calls this time round, supporters will be not only be directed towards the Thrive mental health app, which we are offering free through our Health & Wellbeing Partner, Health Shield, but also sign-posted to a mental health workshop delivered by Aberdeen FC’s Community Trust in December.

Finally, I want to reiterate that Aberdeen Football Club is willing to make Pittodrie Stadium available, no strings attached, for distribution of the vaccine. The highly-regulated environment we’ve invested in for fans will ensure safe distribution of the vaccine.

I trust you will convey this message to the decision-makers and that we can expect answers from Jason Leitch and/or ministers.

 

Dave Cormack

Chairman

Aberdeen Football Club