Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Neil Drysdale: Wisden marks the start of spring, but the Hundred could spell a summer of discontent

Scotland captain, Kyle Coetzer plays a shot during the One Day International match between Scotland and Afghanistan at The Grange Cricket Club, Edinburgh, in 2019.
Scotland captain, Kyle Coetzer plays a shot during the One Day International match between Scotland and Afghanistan at The Grange Cricket Club, Edinburgh, in 2019.

There’s a point in popular culture where people start raving about a “must-see” new TV series or movie and you end up watching and scratching your head in bemusement.

It happened with “Killing Eve” when it was launched in 2018 – all that stylishly-shot cartoon violence and love-hate relationship between Jodie Comer and Sandra Oh; and it happened with Christopher Nolan’s films “Interstellar ” and “Dunkirk”, which gained rave reviews, but struck me as bloodless, boring triumphs of CGI effects over humanity or a plot.

In some cases, you just have to ignore the hype, accept that something isn’t for you and seek pleasure in other things. Yet that doesn’t mean your criticism isn’t valid. And the same reservations apply to the sporting world, where new competitions and tournaments are being cooked up by administrators without any evidence they will be worthwhile or find an audience.

That brings us to The Hundred, a cricket format which, even as I write these words, seems to have been devised by a committee which has no acquaintance with the game. The inaugural season of the 100-ball competition was delayed last summer by the Covid pandemic, but it will start in July with eight men’s and women’s teams battling it out to reach the final on August 21.

For the uninitiated, and even as the latest edition of Wisden has been published, the event will dispense with the word “wickets” and replace it with “outs”. Overs directed at “batters” will no longer comprise six balls, but 10, and we will be in a world where Birmingham Phoenix meet London Spirit and Trent Rockets tackle Northern Superchargers, while Oval Invincibles do their utmost to extinguish Welsh Fire. Oh, and there will be “X Factor” players who can be introduced at certain stages of the action – which is effectively sanctioning substitutes in the cricket sphere.

Understandably, not everybody is impressed by this concept. On a positive note, organisers insist it will give equal weight to both men’s and women’s sides, with the matches taking place as back-to-back double-headers at venues across England and Wales on the same day.

But the objections far outweigh the bold claims of the cheerleaders. Is there truly room in the calendar for another crash-bang-wallop pyjama party? Isn’t this Hundred venture simply another means of killing off interest in longer versions of the game on the county and Test circuit? And, in a pastime which is increasingly dominated by the Indian Premier League and variations such as the Vitality Blast and the Big Bash League, why is the sport pandering so much to viewers who demand results in three or four hours?

From a purely parochial perspective, it’s also frustrating that the tournament has no Scottish and Irish representation. Heaven knows, in the aftermath of the pandemic, cricket needs to pull together, both to encourage the grassroots and salvage shattered finances, on and off the pitch.

Was it really beyond the wit of the organisers to extend the structure to include one Scottish and one Irish side in the mix? As is stands, there are eight composite sides in contention. Another two could surely have been accommodated and, considering that Kyle Coetzer, Matt Cross, Calum MacLeod and their compatriots haven’t played a single meaningful match since 2019, the opportunity for them to prepare for the World T20 in India later this year would surely have been grabbed with both hands.

Sadly, though, there isn’t much sign of the leading Test nations appreciating their responsibility to help the lesser lights. The “Big Three” – England, India and Australia – have carved up the schedules and too often seem determined to create a system where they alone and nobody else takes centre stage.

It’s a terribly short-sighted attitude, yet The Hundred has an even bigger problem in selling itself. In essence, and regardless of how you spin the details, it’s virtually the same as Twenty20. The latter, which has become a global phenomenon in less than 20 years, amounts to both teams having 120 balls from which to plunder as many runs as possible.

The Hundred equates to 16.4 overs – or just 3.2 overs fewer than the existing format which already commands huge amounts of attention. Can you imagine if the IRB decided to capitalise on the success of the world Sevens circuit by introducing a new six-a-side variation?

Or, for those with long memories, the SFA suddenly announced it was reviving the Tennents’ Sixes; the annual indoor tournament, which was contested every January by senior football clubs from Scotland – along with some English guests – between 1984 and 1993.

Perhaps, despite these misgivings, the Hundred will preach to the unconverted and many of the fixtures are being screened on terrestrial TV, which will provide the women’s game with valuable exposure and a higher profile. But the feeling persists that the ECB – and it is not alone – is blindly chasing a market which is already being satisfied by Twenty 20.

No wonder many fans of the county game feel worried at these developments. And the marginalisation of associate nations such as Scotland – who beat the world champions England in 2018 – is another concern.

In which light, the Hundred is one century I won’t be celebrating!